User talk:Alex Stanek 9999

Hello Alex Stanek 9999! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! WinBot 06:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Useful templates • Categories • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Tools • User scripts

Your edit to Resistance: Fall of Man

Your recent edit to Resistance: Fall of Man (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page blankings

What is the meaning of this, this and this. Please do not continue in this manner or you will be blocked for vandalism. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 14:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during November 30 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 14:15, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Too late...

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia because of disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism, including page blanking or addition of random text, spam, or deliberate misinformation; privacy violations; personal attacks; and repeated and blatant violations of WP:NPOV will not be tolerated. Syrthiss 14:16, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please somebody else loggeed on as me and i didnt do anything. i HAVE FOUND TH CULPRIT aand punishec him. Thans for reading this.

Your edits to Cantell Secondary School

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Accurizer 14:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted your unsourced attack page Crime in Portswood. Any further vandalism of Wikipedia will result in an block. You have been warned. Syrthiss 14:36, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Meteoroid (talk) 05:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandsamondrugs

A tag has been placed on Alexandsamondrugs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kon-Tiki001 14:04, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandsamondrugs

A tag has been placed on Alexandsamondrugs, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Alexandsamondrugs. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The Kinslayer 11:44, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Alexandsamondrugs. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Kinslayer 11:49, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bubba hotep 11:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2007

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. MER-C 11:53, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- Bubba hotep 21:49, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

April 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Cantell Secondary School, are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Waggers 12:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC) ahahahaha u may have blocked me for now but ill be back and in force too. this is the code to all others ATTDR and follow with dffffhgs.[reply]

i think i should be ublocked as i have learnt my lesson. the reason for my vandalism was a. someone knew my password and therefore vandalised on it and b. i was angry because on my other accounts perfectly good edits were reverted back.