User talk:Alex Grimsson

Orphaned non-free image File:Hold the Dark (US cover 2014).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hold the Dark (US cover 2014).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Alex Grimsson/sandbox

Hello, Alex Grimsson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Alex Grimsson! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Book articles

Hi! I saw that you were working on a book draft prior to it being deleted as stale. I wanted to give you some general tips and feedback about the draft, since book related articles are kind of my jam.

For the section about the differences, this would need to have sourcing of some type and be more concrete, so as to avoid issues of original research. It's why most book or adaptation articles lack a section of this nature, so I recommend leaving it out until you find good sourcing for this.

Avoid blanket statements like "Many reviews compared...", as this poses a few issues. The first is that it's often inaccurate and not backed up by the sources - in this situation you have a sole review. You could write that the specific review outlet drew a comparison, but you can't say that more than one reviewer did this. The term "many" also implies a majority, at least when it comes to Wikipedia. When it comes to this sort of thing I usually like to write it as "Multiple media outlets compared..." or "Multiple media outlets such as (one of the outlets) compared...". You could also use the statement "Media outlets such as...".

This seems like it's splitting hairs, but essentially this shows that more than one outlet made the comparison or statement without implying that it was a very large number or majority. It's also often better to cite an example, since that can help as well.

I would make the translations section into a general release section that lists the original publication that includes information about the translations. This is mostly because in general the translations typically won't receive enough coverage to justify its own section. It's not an absolute hard rule, but it's how I typically style such sections and it's common to see this on Wikipedia.

Only the first word of a header should be capitalized unless it's a formal title or name.

This needs more coverage as a whole, but I'm not as focused on that since you're clearly still in the process of working on the article. If it helps you out any, I do have a generic framework for book articles that I created a bit back. Not all of the sections have to be in every article, but it has the basics. This brochure on creating and editing book articles may also be helpful. It was written with students in mind, but can be used by anyone.

Also absolutely feel free to ask me with any questions, as well as let me know when you're done with the article. I can help review the article and let you know if it needs anything or if it's ready. I think that your draft looks good as a whole, so I'm excited to see how it looks when you're all done! ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:15, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hold the Dark

Hello, Alex Grimsson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hold the Dark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]