User talk:AlexMehtidis

Welcome!

Hello, AlexMehtidis, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you may find helpful:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Wikipedia:Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or post a question on your own talk page. Again, welcome! FourPaws (talk) 11:41, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your sourcing on the Arado Ar 196 article - please discuss on the talk page

There are problems with the sources you added to the Arado Ar 196 - the cite for Greek use to The Mediterranean and Middle East is vague and doesn't seem to back up the claim, while Frank Joseph, the author of the book you are basing the claim of Romanian use, appears of questionable reliability. Please discuss this on the article talk page.Nigel Ish (talk) 12:02, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea who Frank Joseph is, I am referring to Arado Ar 196 Units in Combat by Peter De Jong, a well respected publication. AlexMehtidis (talk) 04:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 33mm A.P.X. (Ateliers des Puteaux) (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:33mm A.P.X. (Ateliers des Puteaux) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AlexMehtidis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 33mm A.P.X. (Ateliers des Puteaux) has been accepted

33mm A.P.X. (Ateliers des Puteaux), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gorden 2211 (talk) 02:02, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lancaster edits

Thank you for trying to fix the nonsense about the Lancaster being seriously considered for use with an atomic bomb. I tried to do the same and was also immediately reverted. Some seem to be clinging desperately to a false but cherished idea. There must be an avenue of appeal to a higher authority. Tupelo the typo fixer (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yes, it's somewhat hard to delete the segment, because people ask for a source - but of course you can't find a source that talks about something that's completely made up. It's reflecting very badly on the editors which are keeping that up on the Lancaster page, I have no idea why it's still there... I'm not sure who to appeal, other than continuing to take it down. AlexMehtidis (talk) 11:33, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]