User talk:AlexHale

Hello, AlexHale! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:49, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Regarding your edits to Smallville (TV series)

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Hannah Montana, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NrDg 23:46, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes, such as you did in the article Hannah Montana episodes. Cease and desist from introducing misinformation into Wikipedia if you are attempting to test our ability to detect and remove it. This has been done before, with universally negative results. Hoaxes are marked for deletion shortly after they are created. Kindly — do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia, and then to check to see how long they have been in place and, if possible, correct them. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thanks, NrDg 23:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Alex Hale

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Alex Hale, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Alex Hale seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Alex Hale, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Alex Hale has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 18:20, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Alex Hale constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 18:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Alex Hale. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 18:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you created that page. Wait a while, and an administrator will delete it if the tag is kept there. —La Pianista ^{(T•C•S•R)} 18:24, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to MySpace, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DiverseMentality 02:36, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to American Idol (season 8), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 00:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Daughtry (band). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 04:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Untitled (Daughtry Album)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Untitled (Daughtry Album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable future album with no sources to confirm its existence.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TN X Man 23:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alex and Tom Show

A tag has been placed on Alex and Tom Show requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 03:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Stop vandalizing Wikipedia by removing sourced content from articles as you did to Adam Lambert. If you refuse to stop, you will be blocked from editing. Unitanode 03:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of No Surprise (Daughtry)

An article that you have been involved in editing, No Surprise (Daughtry), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Surprise (Daughtry). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Aspects (talk) 16:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with No Surprise (Daughtry), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. T3chl0v3r (talk) 16:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with No Surprise (Daughtry), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - TexasAndroid (talk) 21:58, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Adam Lambert.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:07, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did I get blocked? I wrote what was true, Adam Lambert was safe.

You wrote it before the announcement was made. Quit trying to play innocent. Gage (talk) 00:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to ignore Wikipedia's policy of verifiability or you will be blocked again, next time for longer. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:39, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post American Idol results based on that kind of sourcing. Thanks. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 16:45, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Kris Allen. Gage (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Adam Lambert. Gage (talk) 22:55, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for tendentious editing: unverifiable/unsourced, after multiple warnings. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. - Philippe 23:09, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

June 2009

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Transformers: Revenge of The Fallen, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. AcesUpMaSleeve (talk) 01:37, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sales figure

Sorry to be skeptical, but what is your source for this edit? Thanks, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This website said that sales... http://mjsbigblog.com/

AfD nomination of Reality Killed The Video Star

An article that you have been involved in editing, Reality Killed The Video Star, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reality Killed The Video Star. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. keystoneridin! (talk) 06:31, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some sources to this article. If you have more sources for some of the info you've added as well as other sources which meet WP:V please add them and some content to the article.--Crossmr (talk) 08:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Reality Killed The Video Star

On August 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Reality Killed The Video Star, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 20:15, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Smallville

Please do not recreate the Smallville: Absolute Justice page. It doesn't meet our notability criteria. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 02:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notices

Hi Alex. I strongly suggest you don't ignore and remove edit notices, such as you did here. Please instead use the article's talk page to discuss the issue. Thanks. Tim meh 02:13, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Killing in the Name

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Killing in the Name. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adambro (talk) 19:05, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at No Ordinary Family. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Logical Fuzz (talk) 22:52, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of I Still Ain't Over You

The article I Still Ain't Over You has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SONG. This song has not charted, has not won awards, and has not even been reviewed or commented on by reliable external sources. LK (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LK (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Merry Christmas, Drake & Josh, you may be blocked from editing. Şłџğģő 20:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at One Less Lonely Girl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Theleftorium ^(talk) 14:05, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stay the Night (James Blunt song)

The article Stay the Night (James Blunt song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails the criteria for a notable song.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TrulyBlue (talk) 16:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stay the Night (James Blunt song) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Stay the Night (James Blunt song), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stay the Night (James Blunt song) until a concensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 16:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Stay the Night (James Blunt song), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 17:00, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Don't keep adding the midweek updates to articles. They are completely irrelevant Mister sparky (talk) 18:43, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 104 (Band)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as 104 (Band), to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Deadly∀ssassin 14:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as 104 (Band), you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please don't create hoax articles. Deadly∀ssassin 14:13, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The End As We Know It

The article The End As We Know It has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Hoax article relating to one deleted on band 104 (Band)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Deadly∀ssassin 17:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

This is your last warning; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Walsh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:19, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are obviously capable of contributing constructively to Wikipedia, so why do you feel the need for stupid vandalism like this? --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:22, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did it as a joke. I find it quite funny. :) It must have made you laugh.

December 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Rodhull andemu 18:15, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too many warnings, with no improvement in constructive editing; your comment above tells me you are not here to help build an encyclopedia. Rodhull andemu 18:17, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]