User talk:Alex9788

Welcome!

Hello, Alex9788, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

WP:SIGN

Regards this edit, please sign your posts. Thanks! WLU 17:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Advance wars

I responded to you on Talk:Advance Wars. The scratchpad Wikia is preferable for unit details anyway.— Preceding unsigned comment added by User:JuigiKario (talk • contribs)

Redirect

Hi,

Thanks for spotting that. It also seems that I forgot about WP:CSD#R1 when creating those redirects. I was making them to improve the functionality of a new infobox, implementing redirects to planned articles. Never mind.

Cheers, –MDCollins (talk) 16:06, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VP

Replied. Cbrown1023 talk 17:02, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

who does not appear to be big on talking?

Sometimes it's useful to not spread a single discussion to so many different pages. Ewlyahoocom 09:16, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

True, but I can justify each one if you need me to:

Talk:Sportsperson is where someone else started the discussion, so nothing to do with me.

Talk:Athlete was the logical place to discuss the possible change.

Talk:List_of_words_having_different_meanings_in_British_and_American_English was neccessary to have athlete listed on that page, so is a seperate discussion.

User_talk:Ewlyahoocom was just out of courtesy, to let you know what I was doing, in case you were interested.

I am sorry if you disagree with my methods, but I was hoping you would respond on at least one of the above pages. It would've been impolite of me to simply make my change for a second time before you had a chance to have a say in the matter. Alex9788 09:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I responded right here hours ago. Ewlyahoocom 09:33, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah ok, I wasn't watching your user page but fair enough. Alex9788 09:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re : Walsall Wood

Hi, there is no time limit for restoration. Reason for deletion is avaliable on request, it is prodded by MNewnham as "A non-notable ward of a voting constituency in the UK". For undeletion, simply reply that you object to the reasons of prod and include your justifications. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 13:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Walsall Wood has been restored by PROD objection. Please note that the article may still be liable for an article for deletion discussion. Please improve on the article, preferrably with reliable sources to conform to Wikipedia policies and reduce its likelihood of deletion. - Best regards, Mailer Diablo 13:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Athletes

I didn't realise you'd posted on my talk page. Thanks for fighting for the disambiguation page for Athlete. Cheers.--Jcvamp (talk) 00:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dosed (song)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dosed (song), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://dbpedia.org/page/Dosed. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alex9788. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]