User talk:Alex878

Welcome!

Hello, Alex878, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Tracy Von Doom (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Human to machine translation moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Human to machine translation, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 14:09, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Human yo machine interface

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Human yo machine interface, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

The page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. (See section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.
It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. qedk (t 桜 c) 15:19, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Human to machine translation (September 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at User interface. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Human to machine translation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Human to machine translation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alex878! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below.

{{unblock | reason=Have no clue what you re talking about?!!!! What is "SunnyBeachTourist" and what this have to do with H2M translation ?![[User:Alex878|Alex878]] ([[User talk:Alex878#top|talk]]) 17:26, 25 September 2019 (UTC)}} This has nothing to do with Draft:Human to machine translation and everything to do with Balkanholidays, which was substantially similar to that of a previously blocked user. --Yamla (talk) 17:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alex878 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

you blocked someone for some reason What that have to do with me? Can you let me know what is wrong with this article?! Alex878 (talk) 17:52, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please find another venue for promoting your website. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've already told you. That article was substantially similar to what another, blocked, user created. Why did you create that article? Where did you take the content from? What exactly is your relationship with Balkan Holidays? You've clearly been violating WP:SOCK (or WP:MEAT) and likely, WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:UPE, and WP:PROMO. Note also that you now have two unblock requests. You only need one, and it is inappropriate to have multiple open unblock requests. --Yamla (talk) 17:55, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla,

I was referring a friend of mine to Balkanholidays playing with Alexa and We discovered that they are no info on them on wikipedia but information of useless BHAir and ectr I can get the article on our country village in Bulgaria, but are not able to get info on the oldest operators in Bulgaria? I decided to put something on, spoke to BH in Bulgaria and they referred me to UK Office that provided me with some material that are used as some base removing all marketing slur and ect On my question why they are not on Wikipedia, they mentioned something like Wikipedia is not allowing it for commercial reasons....But then they are tones of pages on Jet2, Thomas Cook and ectr?!

If you don't agree with the article Balkanholiday just let me know please to correct it

I'm associated member of ITU (International Telecom Union) and for me M2M and H2M are important subjects that are of huge importance to me and millions of people

the very existence of the ability to type in the browser www.wikipedia.com and get to a web page is based on H2M translation

I don't work for BH and I never travel with them

TA

This essentially admits to your violation of WP:MEAT and WP:EVADE (editing on behalf of a blocked editor) and adds in violations of WP:COPYRIGHT. I'm done here, there's no point discussing this further. Another admin will be along shortly to review your block. --Yamla (talk) 18:27, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own initiative and decision to publish ! how I'm editing on behalf of... and what is the copy rights i'm braking?

TA

Also can you let me know how on earth I will know that some was blocked for a particular topic?!

why you don't have a flag or something

and I insist some one to tell me what is wrong with the topic of BalkanHolidays !? and the information I put on it?

Regards,

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alex878 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi Still no answer on any of my question Alex878 (talk) 19:45, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were blocked because you created this new account in order to evade a block on your previous account. Request declined. ST47 (talk) 20:18, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alex878 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is incorrect this is my first ever Wikipedia account

Decline reason:

No it isn't. Yunshui ^雲 _水 22:43, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alex878 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this start to look like some kind Admin Revengopidia?! no one gave you any reasonable answer and just some bland accusation without a shred of fact

Wikipedia is a project that supports openness and deal with facts no assumptions, accusation and exercise of "power"

Still no answer on any of my questions

why I m banned for putting a factual information for a 50 years old national company that was privatise and ectr... just for the fact a was looking for reference from them about their UK operation?

is this is in a spirit of Wikipedia?

regards

Decline reason:

This request does not in any way address the problems that lead to your block. Since this is now your fourth unconvincing unblock request, I have revoked your talk page access. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.