User talk:Alex71va

Predictions

I started a discussion on Talk:Boston, Massachusetts about whether or not Wilford Woodruff's prediction should be included in the article. Please head on over and join in on the discussion. --Bobblehead 22:09, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Use of minor edit indicator

You seem to be making a number of non-minor edits under the minor edit indicator. Please review WP:MINOR and adjust your use of the minor edit indicator accordingly. As an example this edit, this edit, and this edit are not minor edits, while this edit and this edit would qualify as minor edits.--Bobblehead 04:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposal

I have moved your proposal to the Wikipedia namespace, since it was displaying as an article. You can now find it at Wikipedia:Prohibition on LDS Endowment details on Wikipedia. -Amarkov moo! 00:57, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that your proposal was rejected by the community. You fail to understand the purpose of Wikipedia; it is not a place for grandstanding or personal soapbox venting. It is a source for information in a neutral manner supported by reputable sources. We are not collection of quotes, but reasoned articled on divers subjects.

You attack other editors who are LDS or who you think are LDS claiming to know their full range of motivations. This is recognized for what it is, a personal attack, which is prohibited on Wikipedia. Continued attacks may result in being blocked from editing for a period of time.

Wikipedia is also a collorborative process. When you find a range of editors reverting your edits, it is because your edits are not acceptable. You might start taking your proposed edits to the talk page and discuss your objectives and work with other editors to achieve a better article. --Storm Rider ^(talk) 23:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you believe that I've made personal attacks. I certainly believe that you've made several condescending remarks and off-topic tangents towards me. I think its best going forward that any of our communications stay on-topic on the details of the articles we're editing. Thus I intend to ignore any comments that get into such off-topic tangents.(Alex71va 02:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)alex71va)[reply]

I frankly think there is plenty of room for improvement in the LDS Endowment article. Go look at the Apostolic Creed article or the articles on many other rituals and major documents and ordinances of religions, governments and cultures throughout world history. Open/frank discussion on all the facts and NPOV presentation is the best way to go. By following the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars guidelines I think we can accomplish this successfully.(Alex71va 02:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)alex71va)[reply]