User talk:Alex250P

March 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Grange Park, Blackpool, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 13:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Jackson. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jons63 (talk) 13:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grange Park, Blackpool, you will be blocked from editing. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 14:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Grange Park, Blackpool, you will be blocked from editing. --Snigbrook ^(talk) 12:12, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Connor Jr.

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paul Connor Jr., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Frickative (talk) 22:00, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

September 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Grayson Sinclair has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Miquonranger03 (talk) 18:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You may be factually correct; however, since you have not added a reference for this, there is no verifiability, so I chose to remove the edit. If you can add a reference to a source, online or off, that can corroborate this information, then I will most certainly not touch the edit.

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Liam+Tony.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Liam+Tony.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:32, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April Branning

Hiya, with regards to the birth date of April 1 you have added to the profile, was this ever confirmed on-screen? GunGagdin^Moan 22:18, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I dont doubt you. It's just that it had been included in the article before (along with a different birth year), and I trawled through walford.net to see any evidence of her birthday and couldnt find it mentioned. I just thought I would check, as sometimes people read incorrect data that a vandal may have added here on wiki and then it sort of gets accepted as fact by many readers, and posted as such on forums etc. If you're sure you actually saw the date mentioned, then that's fine.

just to let you know, in order to sign your name on talk pages, just press four ~~~~ (Tilde keys) GunGagdin^Moan 22:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Connor article

Has such a suggestion been discussed? Looking at the article history (pre-merge), it seems there are some references, but I didn't take the time to check their validity. If several others agree then great, but I wouldn't want it be controversial. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 14:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Thank you for your contribution to Quantum of Solace, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember, millions of people read Wikipedia, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox to get started. Thank you. —Erik (talk • contrib) 00:16, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel that your contributions are on a serious note, it may be worth looking at Wikipedia's policy on having a neutral point of view since your addition was negatively slanted. Even a quick look at Rotten Tomatoes shows that this isn't close to being a bad Bond film. You also need to avoid weasel wording and make sure that you cite your contributions using reliable sources. —Erik (talk • contrib) 00:23, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know; I have not been able to keep up with news about the film's reception. We have to look out for retrospective coverage of the film, such as articles looking at how reviews have mostly been. We can't play that role, unfortunately; it could easily be interpreted one way or another, so we use secondary sources for that. For example, Fight Club was pretty divided when it first came out, but it eventually got better. —Erik (talk • contrib) 00:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Max Branning. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Frickative 17:32, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Cotton‎

What is your source for this? How would a reader verify it? Without a source, it's original research, and not permitted here. Please don't replace it without citing a source. --Rodhull andemu 17:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, hang on the spoilers have been officially updated now so I'll put on a proper ref. Alex250P (talk) 17:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, a forum is still not a reliable source here; this is non-negotiable policy, because anyone can contribute to a forum and we have no way of knowing whether what they say is true. You'd be better off citing a TV magazine of some sort. That's just the way it has to be here. --Rodhull andemu 17:36, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Connor, reply

Obviously I'm unable to monitor all pages, but thanks for pointing that out - I've now changed it. I think it would be suitable to keep the actresses' maternity leave on their pages, not on the characters. This is Drew (talk) 17:32, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Though not completely, the unreferenced section is now removed. Don't get yourself worked up. The new re-written piece now seems to link more to the character, not the actress - so it's all good. Let this be the end of the matter.This is Drew (talk) 17:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Alex and Ryan fight.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alex and Ryan fight.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:24, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Maria Connor.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Maria Connor.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Miller's house explosion.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Miller's house explosion.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:07, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Danielle Jones

Hey, bit of a dim question, but I just wondered if you could point out where in Danielle's Diary it says her birthday's in July? I'm probably just missing it because it's gone two in the morning, but I can't see it in there... sorry to be a pest :) Frickative 02:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of headings

Alex, the Wikipedia style for capitalizing headings is to use "sentence case" instead of "title case", e.g.,

Important things to know about this subject

not:

Important Things to Know About This Subject

This may be unfamiliar to many editors who believe that or have been taught that "title case is the right way to capitalize headings". It isn't the "right way", it is one style. Wikipedia has, for better or worse, chosen to follow a different style, i.e., capitalize the heading the same way you would capitalize any sentence:

capitalize the first word,
capitalize any proper nouns (people, places, organizations), and
begin all other words with lower case letters.

See WP:MSH for more information. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 13:18, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Lukestrong.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Lukestrong.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Poppy Merritt. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —LedgendGamer 02:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for using an edit summary, that's all I was looking for. Now that I understand what you're doing, you might want to redirect the page. —LedgendGamer 02:07, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Archie and Peggy

Please can you wait until they're actually married on screen? Thanks. ^anemone│_projectors 21:00, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Secret Mitchell

I redirected this article to Danielle Jones (EastEnders) because the whole storyline centres around her. All the information in the article you created is found in Danielle's, so there's no need to duplicate it. Also, claiming that you "created the page fully and added pictures, references etc" on your user page is a bit out of order when all you did was copy and paste it from another article. You didn't even copy the references correctly and you certainly didn't upload the image. ^anemone│_projectors 20:56, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I didn't claim I uploaded the pictures or anything i said i ADDED it. And I haven't completely finished it the whole promotion/reception part as the ratings haven't been released yet so could you at least wait before you at least consider deleting it as if that is the case then why hasn't Sharongate or Get Johnny Week been deleted?? Alex250P (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because they're not completely covered in other articles. If you think they should be deleted, why not list them at AFD? But I think you should read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Ratings can still go in Danielle's article when they're released. And it's still out of order to claim you did all that work when all you did was copy and paste. ^anemone│_projectors 21:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote the ENTIRE plot section no copies, I copied the photo as the one I tried to upload tonight wouldn't work and I just copied the promotion section so there would be something there before the ratings come out when I will condense and edit it Alex250P (talk) 21:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well then I apologise. I assumed it was copied, as the other sections were. But that doesn't mean the article is necessary. ^anemone│_projectors 21:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Danielle.png

Thanks for uploading File:Danielle.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article you have edited is being considered for deletion - The Secret Mitchell

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Secret Mitchell for more infomation. Dalejenkins | 17:58, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

William and Holly Trott

Were Heather's grandparents mentioned on screen? I don't recall. AnemoneProjectors (what?) 16:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good stuff. AnemoneProjectors (what?) 21:22, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Hi, we've decided to follow the WP:YEAR guideline for EastEnders characters, by using two digits for the second year in durations in infoboxes. I'd appreciate it if you didn't change them back. The only exception is if the first date is in the 1980s or 1990s and the second is in the 2000s. Thanks :) AnemoneProjectors (what?) 20:26, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did at first... someone was putting them one way and someone else was putting them another way, but it wasn't consistent through the whole infobox, so I decided they should all be the same. I kinda liked the shorter way as it takes up less space, but then again I only asked one person's opinion who said it didn't matter and I should do what I like! In reality it's just an infobox and isn't important, but now that all of them are the same, I think they should stay like that. Or I'd have a job to change them all back the other way! AnemoneProjectors (what?) 20:33, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I asked on WT:EE#Years in infoboxes. WP:YEAR says "A closing CE/AD year is normally written with two digits (1881–86) unless it is in a different century from that of the opening year (1881–1986). The full closing year is acceptable." So it could be done either way, but I went for the "normally" bit. AnemoneProjectors (what?) 20:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If it's a different century like 1998-2001 then it shouldn't be 1998–01, but different decades are ok, like 1989–1992 would be 1989–92. AnemoneProjectors (what?) 21:07, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem was that there was an edit war going on and there was no consistency. I'm wondering if I should change them all back though! AnemoneProjectors (what?) 15:45, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It wouldn't be hard for me to use AWB (AutoWikiBrowser) to change them all back again. I just kinda think we should wait a while as it's not very long since I've done it. If anyone else mentions it I'll do it then. To be honest, if the only problem is how it looks to you, then I think it's not worth changing them all back right now. It's only an infobox, after all. AnemoneProjectors (what?) 16:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's a piece of software that you have to be approved to use. WP:AWB for more information. I'll ask at the EastEnders project again if anyone thinks I should change them all back. AnemoneProjectors (what?) 17:39, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Connor

Where did you get the information on the back history of this character. How do you know the dates of when the character was with Dean and JD. A reference for all this information should be cited.Raintheone (talk) 16:17, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I see. You have one good memory. I just made some changes to the article. (As you know most of the articles on the characters are just full of plot details.) I have a ton more things to transform that article. Seeings as all that information you added on the character is to do with the character's early relationships, could I put it into the relationship field on the development section. Good work too within the wikiproject on Corrie. Raintheone (talk) 17:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've made quite a few changes now then, condensed some, added more info on relationships from the view of the actress even though a lot of info can still be condensed. Added personality info, gave it a bit of a tidy too. What do you think? Which articles do you plan on working on next? There is so much work to be done, most of the other contributors in the wikiproject are too busy with Eastenders atm though... Raintheone (talk) 21:46, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think one of the hardest tasks when editing an article that has the whole plotlines reiterated is extracting the relationship information out from the storylines. In most character articles relationships are included in the development part. With this particular article I found it hard to do that and removed anything to do with men out from the storylines section into relationships section. Mainly because if the relationship storylines do not hold had any impact on society in the out world context then the information doesn't have any point of being on here, so when it is included in the development it can be used to describe the affect it has on transforming the development of the character, which then sort of does have a place on here. What the character recieves in drama filled plots do have an affect like the baby swap story, as in some circumstances it does happen. With the early plot part I was trying to condense a little to much as I plan on expanding some time. You can though, as you have a better memory for the little details without having to cite a reference. Maria is a good article, one of the key things on that right now is finding out the background and why producers brought the character into the show. It says the character was created on the whim of mainly being a love interest for Tyrone. How do we cite that, I couldn't find it on the net... With the Michelle article i happened to have a couple of mags lying about from three year period that for some reason all had different interviews with Kim Marsh discussing the character.... odd ayee. (Hope that makes sense... :/ ) Raintheone (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which Next?

A challenge. Rita, Emily or Ken? I've done a lot more on Sohpie's so maybe Rosie too. (Sophie is so easy to find sources for, don't why though..) Raintheone (talk) 19:13, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just need to find the stuff. Here provides a insight to what she thought to being a goth on screen... the effect it had on schol children here, but would that be in reception too, as the affect it had on society... it's hard. .. what it was like to play the goth here Her character has evolved from teenage Goth to saucy minx and superbitch here. A lot more too. So what can we do from those? Raintheone (talk) 19:47, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Becky Granger

Why did you change her name to McDonald? It's Granger until she marries. You're usually on top of edits like that. Raintheone (talk) 23:08, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Den Watts

Hello, please can you provide a source that says Leslie Grantham played Den Watts' corpse in the 29 August 2005 episode of EastEnders? I've looked but can't find anything on the internet. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 18:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

it was was not identifiable as Den in August, so it doesnt count. The Danielle example doesnt really work either because if we were to use that rationale then Danielle's last appearance would be the day of her funeral, because technically her body was in the coffin. She didnt appear though, just like Den didnt when his corpse was supposedly removed.GunGagdin ^Moan 18:43, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lauren Crace appeared as a corpse the day after Danielle's death. I just watched a clip of Sam uncovering Den's body and there is absolutely nothing that even resenbles a human body, let alone Leslie Grantham. This is exactly as I remembered it, so I think you're the one who didn't watch the episode. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation of headings again

I think the explanation I provided above is very clear. If there is anything you do not understand, please ask questions instead of continuing to format articles incorrectly as you have done here. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 22:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And again, here, you are incorrectly changing headings and creating new incorrect headings. This creates work for other editors who have to correct the mistakes that you keep making despite explanations. In the future, I will just revert your edits if they include errors. You can make them again, correctly, if you wish. I will not spend time cleaning up after you. Ground Zero | t 22:10, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

George Trott

Hi, can you let me know how you know Heather will name her son George? The scripts say George but from what we know it could be a cover up. The recent Digital Spy interview did not mention the baby's name. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 13:43, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Either way, it still hasn't happened on screen yet. This is not an encyclopaedia of the future. Patience, people! :) Stephenb (Talk) 14:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Tilsley

The issue is that you insist on Capitalising Every Word In A Heading, which is not the Wikipedia style. Please review WP:HEAD, or at least the explanation that I have already put on your talk page for your convenience. Ground Zero | t 00:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Connor

Again, please try to follow Wikipedia style on headings. Random capitalisation of words in headings makes the articles look a mess. Ground Zero | t 14:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Corrie template

I noticed you appreciated the infobox template I re-added for Coronation Street. The template is currently up for deletion again, could you possibly help in saving it? Thanks. Ooh, Fruity 18:50, 6 December 2009 (UTC) {{Infobox Coronation Street character}}

Sorry, but after realising that alot of info was lost, I only respected it because it brought the birthdates back which I think were sorely missed. Sorry Alex250P (talk) 20:38, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alex and Ryan fight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alex and Ryan fight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:52, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Tracy is sent down.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tracy is sent down.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Soap characters

See Wikipedia:TFD#Characters templates 3. 134.253.26.6 (talk) 21:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of minor Coronation Street characters

Hey :) Thought this discussion might be of interest to you, would love your opinion. Ooh, Fruity @ Ooh, Chatty 19:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you go?

Where are you at these days? You should totally come back and start the editing again. We need the good old soapies back. =DRain the 1 ^BAM 01:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wooooo! I thought you'd never return lol. Corrie is still in the past tbh.. I ended up concentrating on Hollyoaks, Neighbours and Home & Away.RaintheOne ^BAM 15:26, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Romances aren't needed anymore because they are not important connections from an out of universe perspective. We have basically done away with them in every filed of soap - just American soaps that are hanging onto that one. Carla is a good choice to work on, I'm not sure I can give any time to Corrie atm though.RaintheOne ^BAM 13:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Character Infobox Durations

Please stop changing the format of the durations in soap characters' infobox. We held a discussusion months ago that if the character reappears within one calendar year for example, First appearance: 4 February 2008, Returned: 1 February 2009, then we keep the duration as 2008—. Thanks. GSorby – Ping! 20:55, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Alfie Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Moon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Pat Evans

Hi

Can I ask why this was re-inserted? There isn't any need for so much detail on the characters death, what was there before should be ample information.--5 albert square (talk) 20:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of Coronation Street characters (1986), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mike Baldwin and Peter Barlow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of Coronation Street characters (2006), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Rain the 1 17:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Frank Butcher. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. George^Ping! 18:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Tyler Moon, you may be blocked from editing. George^Ping! 18:32, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Izzy Armstrong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matt Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lexis dad

Hey I dont want to get in an edit war on this. But surely an experienced editor like you knows this type of thing has to be sourced especially if it hasn't been said on the show. I think you are referring to an interview with Danielle Herold in Inside Soap. Now, although the magazine states, that Ben is Lexi's father, Danielle does not confirm that, So we couldn't use that even if it could be sourced online. Bleaney (talk) 21:58, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, yes I agree sorry if I've come off a little hot-headed over this it's just frustrating as me and AP did stumble across a reliable source where Danielle Harold confirmed she 'couldn't wait for everybody to discover Ben was the father' but it's frustrating that I can't find it - although it was a magazine interview. Alex250P (talk) 22:00, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I think we all know deep down that Ben is Lexi's dad, it's kinda obvious. But Its also a spoiler, and i'm kinda strict about reveling spoilers here on Wiki unless its sourceable. Bleaney (talk) 22:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Alex250P. You have new messages at JuneGloom07's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- JuneGloom Talk 00:50, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Peter Barlow (Coronation Street), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Rain the 1 15:13, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maria Connor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve McDonald (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard Hillman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Platt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Coronation Street characters (2012), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mary Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Platt (Coronation Street), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe McIntyre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zainab

That is what I'd call a drive by edit. You aren't meant to chuck info in the lead like that - I see it as half a job. Next time create a section on her departure. The lead is meant to reflect the article - not a dumping ground for departure info. There is useful information that has been excluded too.Rain the 1 02:33, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kirsty attacks Tyrone (Coronation Street), May 2012.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Kirsty attacks Tyrone (Coronation Street), May 2012.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:10, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eva Price, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steve McDonald and Peter Barlow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coronation Street timeline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Barlow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Coronation Street characters (2013), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Platt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DOB/DOD

Have you decided whether or not you are gonna start the debate in the infobox? Also, I was wondering just how did we get the birthdates for some of the characters anyway? Arjoccolenty (talk) 12:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do I just go ahead and put my point across? I don't really know how to start one, and when celebrated in episodes they were added - maybe if they were put back in then we could reference the episode, although some artistic license has to be given as they can often be celebrated on different dates of the week (depending on what date the episode is aired i.e Monday/Wednesday/Friday for Corrie) Alex250P (talk) 14:57, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Although the report was not filed against you, I've nonethless left you a warning at WP:AN3. Please read it.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:19, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carter family (EastEnders), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Carter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones

Hello, Alex250P. You have new messages at Gareth Griffith-Jones's talk page.
Message added 16:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

I replied to you there quite soon after your post.
Since then I have edited a little there; please could you let me know if what I have done is in-line with your thoughts on the article? — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 16:27, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your prompt response! Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 16:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Tiff

Just to let you know. [1] Cheers! — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 09:14, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, I thought that might happen Gareth, I feel it's worth mentioning somewhere in her article though, but I'm not sure where the best place would be? Alex250P (talk)

April 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to David Wicks, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Acting against consensus determined by members of WP:EE - please discuss, agree and change rather than merely changing and telling others to accept it. Thank you. Rain the 1 21:19, 8 April 2014 (UTC) There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alex250P. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Whitney confesses.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whitney confesses.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]