User talk:Alejandro Correa Rueda

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Alejandro Correa Rueda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chilean (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

References according, eg. [1] , [2] etc

All the references: [1], [2],[3], etc

Dear Friendly,

Thanks for your support.

Any of you need to repair my references according your nomenclature; eg. [1] , [2] etc. and so on. Because me you not to make it: (1) or (2), (3) etc., not well fact.

Thank you!. Please.

Kind regards

Alejandro Correa Alejandro Correa Rueda (talk) 12:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not write an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Daniel Case (talk) 17:07, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alejandro Correa Rueda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alejandro Correa Rueda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Correa Rueda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Daniel Case (talk) 17:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

I just hope that my work serves any person. Only wish to cooperate with you. Thanks for the opportunity!.

Your friend,

Alejandro Correa Alejandro Correa Rueda (talk) 18:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

Dear Daniel,

Please do not delete the page. I followed his advice and the unnecessary links I've deleted of the page. Please see the page. I promise not to intervene more on that page. I have always cooperated with wikipedia. Thanks ! Daniel.

Alejandro Alejandro Correa Rueda (talk) 12:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Alejandro Correa Rueda

I saw your comment regarding the deletion of Alejandro Correa Rueda on the Articles for Discussion page. Please note that I moved the comment to the talk page in order to preserve the archived discussion in the state in which it was closed. If you believe that the article was deleted inappropriately, there are a couple of options available to you:

If you believe that the discussion was closed incorrectly you can open a discussion at Deletion review. Please note that the deletion decision is unlikely to be overturned at deletion review unless I interpreted the debate incorrectly when closing the discussion or if there is significant new information that would have affected the decision.
If you have access to reliable sources that would address the notability concerns raised in the AfD discusison, I can userfy the deleted article for you to give you an opportunity to work on it in user space before returning to article space. You should familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's relevant notability guidelines, particularly the general notability guideline and that for academics if you wish to undertake this option. Please note that even the userfied article page remains subject to being deleted if the page is not being used to improve the article in accordance with the concerns raised in the AfD discussion. Rlendog (talk) 18:04, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	felicitaciones Alejandrin Mattamatta17 (talk) 02:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alejandro Correa Rueda. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> The Book of Chzz, Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:04, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]