User talk:Alejandro.evaristo.perez

Welcome!

Hello, Alejandro.evaristo.perez, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! VViking_TalkEdits 13:57, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:03, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:05, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

\\Invisibility Technology - Patented Technology and within Scope of Editing\\

Viking The statements and edits I provided are true and within editing on Wikipedia. Not advertising.

In 2019, Alejandro Evaristo Perez, a US War Veteran and IT Leader, filed a patent (METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUS FOR MULTI-USE MULTI-VISION MODULAR INVISIBLE COVERS) with the United States Patent Office (USPTO), a 78-page grant proposal with grant.gov, and founded a company called Invisible Forge Inc. He created an invisible helmet prototype proof of concept, which he displayed at the 2019 SXSW Interactive Conference in Austin, Texas. The 91-page USPTO patent (16/267,385) explains how several invisible configurations function using mesh P2P video streaming between smart devices, displays, and cameras to create a "See-Through" effect both in static and in motion. The invisible modular cloak (cloak of invisibility) is within the scope of the patent as one of the embodiment of the invention. Using [Cisco Systems Inc.'s terminology], these invisible configurations use "Inverse Telepresence" to create the "See-Through" effect. The patent covers additional technological methods used to improve and sustain the "See-Through" effects, such as video telemetry, video stitching, multiple video instances, and more.

USPTO.gov is a WP:Primary Source anyone can file for a patent. Grant.gov WP:Primary Source anyone can file for a grant. invisibleforge.com external promotional link in body of article and or, external promotional link in a disab page. He displayed it at the sxsw festival, did it get any gain news coverage about it. So yes, it is advertising, I don't care if they are true or not, promotional garbage is promotional garbage. Did you read WP:COI or maybe WP:Paid? do you understand what a disambiguous page is? --VViking_TalkEdits 14:22, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viking I am trying to update the science of invisibility. You have Harry Potter and science fiction material on the page, which is misleading and not scientific. I proved invisibility and the ability to create the Invisible Modular Cloak. All of my statements are facts. Not advertising. Feel free to word it. All of it is true and, Viking, you are withholding the true in Wikipedia. Hence, the SXSW comment, which is a fact. The truth is the purpose of Wikipedia. I had to show it live in a live environment. Maybe the wording is not the greatest, but all of it true. Do not subpress the truth just because you feel in your opinion that it is "Promotional Garbage", which is a very negative opinion and lacks reason to suppress the truth.

You are now trying to [[WP:OWN] and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS WP is based on Reliable Sources, you are also engaged in edit warring. Your latest response to me shows me you have a Conflict of interest in the subject you are writing about. You will get yourself blocked from editing if you keep this up and rightfully so, you have been given multiple warnings and advice on items to read to understand how WP works but you are so stuck on getting your promotional garbage, and yes that is what it is, onto Wikipedia that you refuse to even review and/or follow the information provided. VViking_TalkEdits 14:52, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viking I am going to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard/request#top You rather have Harry Potter as a fact than the real proven invisibility for invisible cloaks as a fact. Yes. Who is suppose to update the truth, but the person that created the invisible modular cloak proven by the invisible modular helmet prototype and proof of concept? I can agree that there could be a Conflict of Interest, but not if I stated the truth and I did not placed it for advertising. I did for science and truth, which you are suppressing.

June 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--VViking_TalkEdits 14:48, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Self-promotion account

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may place {{unblock}} on your user talk page to have the block reviewed. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

\\Invisibility Technology - Real Patented Technology and within Scope of Editing\\ The Truth Suppressed by Viewmont Viking & Ohnoitsjamie (who have NOT contributed to the Science of Invisibility)

Viking & Ohnoitsjamie are suppressing the science of invisibility and blocked my account. I have filed a ticket for unblock my account, so I can post the truth about the science of invisibility. I have an actual working prototype for invisibility. I have a USPTO patent. I filed a grant with a US government agency. I displayed the invisibility prototype the SXSW Interactive 2019. I am a contributor in the US Army Mad Scientist Initiative by the US Army Future Command. What has Viewmont_Viking and Ohnoitsjamie contributed to the science of invisibility? They do not have the right to suppress the truth regarding invisibility. I ask for proof of their work on invisibility. What proof do they have? What real work have they really done for the science of invisibility? Viking & Ohnoitsjamie are hiding and blocking the truth. They needs to be removed from the topics of invisibility and my account returned to full status. The following needs to be posted for all people to see:

In 2019, Alejandro Evaristo Perez, a US War Veteran and IT Leader, filed a patent (METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUS FOR MULTI-USE MULTI-VISION MODULAR INVISIBLE COVERS) with the United States Patent Office (USPTO), a 78-page grant proposal with grant.gov, and founded a company called Invisible Forge Inc. He created an invisible helmet prototype proof of concept, which he displayed at the 2019 SXSW Interactive Conference in Austin, Texas. The 91-page USPTO patent (16/267,385) explains how several invisible configurations function using mesh P2P video streaming between smart devices, displays, and cameras to create a "See-Through" effect both in static and in motion. The invisible modular cloak (cloak of invisibility) is within the scope of the patent as one of the embodiment of the invention. Using [Cisco Systems Inc.'s terminology], these invisible configurations use "Inverse Telepresence" to create the "See-Through" effect. The patent covers additional technological methods used to improve and sustain the "See-Through" effects, such as video telemetry, video stitching, multiple video instances, and more.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Alejandro.evaristo.perez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25457 was submitted on Jun 03, 2019 17:07:36. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]