User talk:Alcapone69
Welcome!
Hello, Alcapone69, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Also I have nominated Dumass for deletion because Wikipedia is not a dictionary. The article will be available for discussion for 7 days, then depending on the discussion an admin will decide whether to delete it or not. You can comment on the discussion by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dumass. If you have any questions feel free to ask me by editing my talk page. Thanks, James086Talk 11:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]--Carabinieri 22:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
August 2007
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Bulldog Bash. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. King Lopez Contribs 09:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Content removed was speculation, not fact. Yes, it was intentional. Alcapone69 12:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ceri peach
[edit]A tag has been placed on Ceri peach requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 00:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2021
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Plymouth shooting, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 23:06, 24 September 2021 (UTC)