User talk:Albin013

Albin013, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Albin013! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Immaculate Conception Of Saint Joseph

The article Immaculate Conception Of Saint Joseph has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fringe theory

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Editor2020 (talk) 19:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hearts of Jesus, mary and Joseph.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hearts of Jesus, mary and Joseph.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:09, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Immaculate Conception of Saint Joseph

Dear Albin013: Your user page indicates that you teach catechism. Please review the information you have posted with a reputable authority in your parish, as none of this is supported by past or present Roman Catholic teaching. Respectfully yours, Mannanan51 (talk) 05:51, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

What is your rationale for reverting the edits to IC of St. Jos.? I provided a reputable source for the statement that Suarez did not "go so far" as you seem to think he did.Mannanan51 (talk) 15:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]