User talk:Albert Simard

License tagging for Image:Knowledge market BW.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knowledge market BW.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Technological revolutions

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Technological revolutions, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fredrick day 20:10, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Knowledge services

See this discussion on some of the reasons why the article was deleted. Please don't let this discourage you from editing. Singu larity 21:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding. Singu larity 18:33, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Various economy (knowledge, Information etc) articles

Are you thinking of aggregating all of them? Otherwise I think they will end up deleted or merged. Too much original research, too much overlap. --Snowded TALK 19:50, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Network Economy for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Network Economy, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Network Economy until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Raymie (t • c) 18:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Knowledge Revolution

The article Knowledge Revolution has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is a poorly maintained synthesis of material from different authors who just happen to use the word 'knowledge' with 'revolution'. There is no citation support for it being a distinctive subject,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Snowded ^TALK 12:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]