User talk:Albert.white

193.1.36.14 is the IP address of ITB.ie. It's an entire campus of computer literate people, some of whom are more skilled than others. I would avoid provoking them in any way.

If they vandalise pages I'll leave warnings as per Wikipedia:Vandalism --Albert.white 14:44, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Turlough Hill

That is one great picture of Turlough Hill! (Sarah777 21:21, 26 March 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks! Just lucky I guess. I was walking on Tonlagee in the snow last year and Turlough Hill really stood out. --Albert.white 21:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rovers

Hi Albert Can you provide me with an on-line link to that statement or something similar ? I will leave the cited material their. It's just that i dont trust Paul Hyland as fair as i could throw him and would like to see a other reference and may on article their. (Gnevin 12:23, 19 April 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Pine Crest School

haha, i did the same thing you did with TW on another page (where i reverted to a vandal edit). oops! i wish they had a confirm button for those links! - One more night 18:24, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

sorry about that! --Albert.white 18:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another classic!

Albert, I just noticed when I was jiggling with the Booterstown marsh article that the heron photo was yours - you do get some good ones! (ps, I think we may have share3d the same apartment in Soldeu too, judging by that shot!! Regards (Sarah777 00:19, 25 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Corkcityfccrest.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Corkcityfccrest.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --03:58, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted! --Albert.white (talk) 10:10, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ring Of Fire Article

Hi Albert, you seem to be the main man on here for Rovers related articles so I thought I'd just leave a short message in relation to an article I came across and subsequently edited and leave it with you. I came across the article on the Johnny Cash song "Ring Of Fire" and noticed an error in the "In Sports" section of the article and corrected it. Since then it has been changed a number of times by a Liverpool fan, presumably monitoring the page, citing a number of rediculous reasons one of which I found insulting. As I'm neither a regular user of wikipedia nor a registered one I reckon I'd be fighting an uphill battle to maintain it in it's factually correct form so if you had a bit of spare time maybe you could do something about it source-wise or using some wiki mechanism that's available to you. I'm sure you've more important articles to deal with such as the main Rovers one and it may seem trivial but I'd appreciate if you gave it a look. Cheers & KOH. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.105.51 (talk) 17:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read and respond to the talk page comment here. Dynablaster (talk) 17:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers Albert, much appreciated. KOH. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.181.19 (talk) 21:08, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He now wants "a direct quote from the aforementioned source in support of the full statement",Talk:Ring of Fire (song)#Shamrock Rovers F.C.. I'm not au fait with wiki law so I don't know if he's chancing his arm or exceeding his mandate but I'll leave it with you. Cheers & KOH.

Images

Hi Albert, I was wondering if you'd be willing to upload the following images in the public domain for use in the SRFC and Tallaght Stadium articles - [1] [2]. Also, if you were able to help in gaining permission/uploading the following image in some way that would be great - [3]. No worries if you're not able to help with any of the above. KOH. Onetonycousins (talk) 08:24, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of David O'Connor (footballer)

I have nominated David O'Connor (footballer), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David O'Connor (footballer) (2nd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:25, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Irish Football

Time to get this kick started again.--Vintagekits (talk) 15:07, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Turlough Hill.jpg

File:Turlough Hill.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Turlough Hill.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Turlough Hill.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:41, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Albert.white! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Wayne Colbert - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Stephen O'Brien (footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:54, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Corkcityfccrest.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Corkcityfccrest.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:25, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wayne Colbert

The article Wayne Colbert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP. Cannot find any indication suggesting that he would pass the GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —W F C— 08:56, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stephen O'Brien (footballer)

The article Stephen O'Brien (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP. Prodded on the assumption after checking the usual places that he never played for Gillingham, but will double-check that with User:ChrisTheDude. In either case there is no assertion of meeting the GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —W F C— 06:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robbie Clarke

The article Robbie Clarke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Plays in the second tier of League of Ireland football - not a fully professional league, fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 10:45, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robbie Clarke for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robbie Clarke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Clarke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 23:26, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Ryan

The article Ian Ryan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage. JMHamo (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tommy Barrett

The article Tommy Barrett has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Shiels

The article Paul Shiels has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 00:00, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Cassidy (footballer)

The article David Cassidy (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 00:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paul Shiels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Shiels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Shiels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WikiProject Football/David Cassidy (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WikiProject Football/David Cassidy (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Shiels until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 14:59, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Derek Pender

The article Derek Pender has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 20:52, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamie Duffy

The article Jamie Duffy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played first-team football in a fully professional league or received significant media coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 14:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC) JMHamo (talk) 14:45, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Albert.white. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ger Rowe

The article Ger Rowe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as per World Football, GSA and Extratime. No coverage outside of match reports and transfer announcements so fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 11:59, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]