User talk:Alant
Hello Alant, and welcome to Wikipedia! The first thing you should know is that we encourage you to be bold. Feel free to edit and improve articles, by clicking any 'edit' link.
If you'd like to test what Wikipedia can do, check out the sandbox - just type and save the page and your text will appear. That's the beauty of a Wiki.
For more information check out our tutorial - it's designed with newcomers in mind, as is the help section. If you'd like to get involved with current projects, have a look at the Community Portal. There are always tasks for users to do, ranging from copyediting to expanding stubs.
I hope you'll enjoy your time here, but be warned, it can become addictive! Feel free to message me, I'm more than happy to help. As an added tip, sign any message you post so users know that you've said it. To do so is delightfully simple, just use the wikicode ~~~~.
Once again, welcome!
James Kendall [talk] 18:52, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
Australian Defence Force
[edit]Thanks a lot for your improvements to this article! I note in one of your edit summaries you were worried about the number of references to David Horner's book. I agree that the number of refs is greater than is desirable, but this book (which was released in 2001 as part of the centenary history of Defence) is probably the only comprehensive history of the ADF and Horner is a very reliable source - he's published a number of very well regarded books and is the editor of the official history of Australian peacekeeping which the Australian War Memorial is currently preparing. --Nick Dowling 10:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks again! In case you were wondering about where all the passive voiced text came from, I'm a public servant so have a tendency to write in the passive voice and my main sources for the article have been Australian Department of Defence publications, which are typically incredibly passive. --Nick Dowling 23:49, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- "This is passive tense because we cannot see who did the establishment. This is active and is it accurate? "During the first decades of the 20th Century, as the three Australian armed services were establishing themselves, they did not share a chain of command."" - that's not quite accurate as there wasn't a single chain of command until 1976, which was a long time after the services were established. I've just fiddled with this sentance again to read: "The three Australian armed services were established by the Australian Government during the first decades of the 20th Century without a single chain of command." What do you think? --Nick Dowling 03:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- I've just tweaked the wording further. I'll now go and do something different so you can take over! --Nick Dowling 03:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Alant, I've nominated this article for consideration as a featured article. If you'd like to comment or vote please visit Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Australian Defence Force --Nick Dowling 08:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Graffiti
[edit]Hi Alan, yes please go ahead...it was just one site that was not advertising...it is full of superb graffiti and I could not see any advertising slant to it...hence the rvt; please edit away as you see fit! what was the academic link you mentioned? thnx Peter morrell 13:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Alant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Flat-four engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Piper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)