User talk:Alan G. Archer

That utter fraud Richard Hoagland does IN FACT solicit money on 'Coast to Coast AM'. I have no desire to get into a revert war--you can verify this fact either by listening every night for about six months (not recommended for your sanity) or by writing to the producer:

Lisa Lyon
Producer, "Coast to Coast AM"
Premiere Radio Network
15260 Ventura Blvd.
SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91403

The fact that the producers permit unaudited soliciting is, of course, a gross abuse of the public airwaves, and possibly illegal. All the more reason to expose the practice.

El Ingles 16:51, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stu, I've been listening to Hoagland on the Art Bell Show/Coast to Coast AM for some ten years and still have a few marbles left. I think that mentioning his solicitation of donations for The Enterprise Mission from listeners of a late-night radio program, and also his promotions of his book, videos and speaking engagements, to be irrelevant and unworthy of an encyclopedia article.

Alan G. Archer 23:24, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do not. It greatly speaks of his motivations. Other editors such as the above one are in agreement with me, and I hear only you on your own side. Please do not change the article again until we've discussed it in the talk page, and beyond that I may seek further action. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 23:59, 17 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your recent work on Hoagland. El Ingles (talk) 21:35, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Something possessed me to give the Hoagland article a belated spring cleaning. I think I'm about a third of the way to completion. It also needs a good restructuring -- too much stuff in the "Background" section. Alan G. Archer (talk) 22:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ref. 127 (Grossinger) alleges that Hoagland wrote most of 'Monuments of Mars' from a prison cell in California. It'd be a nice addition to the article, but my instinct tells me that we'd need a second source for something that controversial. El Ingles (talk) 15:27, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, indeed. Verified public court records would be needed. Alan G. Archer (talk) 06:51, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Could you provide a source for this edit? I've rolled it back until it is, as UNESCO says it is over two million years. _EricLeb⁰¹ (Page | Talk) 21:31, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. The original article author did not realise that the number was 2,023 and not 2.023. Thanks. _EricLeb⁰¹ (Page | Talk) 21:36, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, Eric. If that big old rock had hit South Africa only 2 million years ago, you, I, and Wikipedia would probably not be here today.

Vredefort Dome is also described in Wikipedia's "List of World Heritage Sites in Africa" article as having a diameter of 190 km. That figure may be a misreading of reference #126, the UNESCO Web page at http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1162. The UNESCO page states a crater radius of 190 km. That would be a diameter of 380 km, which is somewhat larger than most references state for the original diameter of the crater. Alan G. Archer (talk) 23:08, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard C. Hoagland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for checking the link. Alan G. Archer (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Accutron science

In my opinion, the time has come to add a section to Richard C. Hoagland about his "measurement" of torsion fields around ancient monuments, using an old Accutron watch and a Mumford precision timer. I don't, however, see any possibility of a citation that is not RCH's own. Do you think that rules out the idea? El Ingles (talk) 21:23, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I went with it. See what you think. El Ingles (talk) 00:04, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into it. Thanks. Alan G. Archer (talk) 20:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Honey Island Swamp monster

Thank you for adding the HISM to the List of cryptids, and for thus alerting me to the article about the HISM, which contains this paragraph: "A legend tells of a train wreck in the area in the early 20th century. A travelling circus was on the train, and from it a group of chimpanzees escaped and interbred with the local alligator population."

Best thing I've read in weeks. --Seduisant (talk) 19:46, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. Alan G. Archer (talk) 19:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fouke Monster, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Apeman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For your absolutely fantastic (and not crazy) contributions to the Aztec, New Mexico, UFO incident - I hope you will consider submitting it to Did You Know? - or else letting me! So great to find a fellow wiki-soul. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:15, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Alan G. Archer (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aztec, New Mexico, UFO incident, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page True (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:07, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aztec, New Mexico, UFO incident

On 9 April 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Aztec, New Mexico, UFO incident, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Aztec UFO Crash was faked to sell devices called "doodlebugs"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aztec, New Mexico, UFO incident. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 06:33, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Legend of Boggy Creek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:16, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard C. Hoagland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:16, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moon landing conspiracy theories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Clean-up on Ralph René

Thank you so much for taking the time to edit that article. I am a Rational Skeptic but an Anthropologist and these guys fascinate me. I don't hate them, disrespect them nor despise them and so when I originally worked hard to make his article more than just a "ha ha, what an idiot" article, I was often reverted and accused of being a nutcase. I believe that documenting the beliefs of people who may be far out there but who have had a significant impact on popular culture is worth doing right with quotes, citations and some basic compassion for their fervor. I understand that men like Ralph René got under the skin of actual rocket scientists and NASA experts, having a couple of those folks in my immediate family. Still, since we are in a post-millenial phase of TV where even the History channel and other "Science" channels are bombarding viewers with shows about "how Squatchy it feels tonight" and worse, we need to keep these articles factual, fair and NPOV. Thanks for your help in re-oganizing things to read more clearly. Great job. As one of the original writers of the article, I salute you! LiPollis (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do what I can with the time I have. I work rather osmotically on articles, often making small changes over time until they look shipshape to me. I have edited 'Ralph René' again, adding a bibliography section and started editing the references in detail. Alan G. Archer (talk) 09:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ralph René may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

A barnstar for you (I couldn't find one for references).

		The Original Barnstar
		For all of your work in cleaning up references in articles about the Moon landing CT. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 22:08, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you kindly for the barnstar :-) Alan G. Archer (talk) 00:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moon landing conspiracy theories in popular culture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page My Life (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on Intelligent Design.

Thanks for the cleanup at Intelligent Design. I've skimmed your changes and I don't see anything I disagree with. I would personally prefer that each substantial change be its own edit or, barring that, you give some notification on the talk page as to what you'll be doing. That said, if making one large change is easier for you, then it's fine by me. Garamond Lethet c 00:19, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I'll consider notifying folks on the talk pages before conducting big page sweeps. Alan G. Archer (talk) 06:04, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also wanted to thank you for the changes on the ID page. Not much to add I really think you did a good job.Кwiztas (talk) 06:45, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Alan G. Archer (talk) 08:29, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hacking Hoagland

Greetings. I would value any contribution you might like to make to Talk:Richard_C._Hoagland#RfC:_Should_article_be_trimmed_down. Stu (talk) 16:52, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Hoagland article...it's been a while. It could use a makeover. Alan G. Archer (talk) 18:56, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Creation and evolution in public education in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Californian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook

Hi Archer. Looks like you dedicate a lot of time to this article, thus I presume you would know - any truth in this? I expect it is the usual FB nonsense, but you would know. Thanks. Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 21:56, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for you

		The Cleanup Barnstar
		Thanks for having the courage and skill to tackle clean up on controversial articles. MrBill3 (talk) 05:59, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, MrBill3! Alan G. Archer (talk) 07:41, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evolution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doubleday. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your Comprehensive cleanup on Evolutionary history of life

Hi! I've noticed you've been conducting a series of edits on Evolutionary history of life. Since your edit summaries only read "Continuing comprehensive clean-up", your particular contributions are not easily identified. From comparing diffs, it appears you are mainly reformatting citations themselves, not the actual text. If this is true, that's fine! However, some additions may be extraneous or less helpful to include, and your time might be better spent not making such changes: 1)access dates for journal articles, online or in print are not needed, since publication date is final and the contents will not change 2) ISSN numbers are for the journals themselves, not for individual articles, cited, so it seems a bit overkill to include such links, e.g. ISSN=1471-2148 for BMC Evolutionary Biology (in this case the periodical info is especially extraneous since all BMC journals are online, open access). I've noticed you also include publisher/society info for journals, which seems a bit like citing a book, then giving directions to a bookstore that sells it. In conclusion, your additions are not incorrect or misleading, but may not necessarily provide any additional aid in obtaining or verifying the references. Cheers! --Animalparty-- (talk) 20:56, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Animalparty. I like working in reverse: edit references first, then edit the text, paying particular attention to verbatim quotations. Reference editing can be a long and tedious process on large articles, but I believe the end results are worth the effort. Direct URL's to journal articles sometimes change, so when I see a redirect or link rot I update URL and the access date (and sometimes remove the direct URL when DOI's, etc., achieve the same result). ISSN 1471-2148 is found twice on Evolutionary history of life. An editor generated reference #149 by using the 'cite DOI' template, which I did not edit. Again, thanks. Alan G. Archer (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for doing all the fiddly improvements to references everyone hates doing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:36, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, NeilN. Alan G. Archer (talk) 07:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for your reference clean-up in the List of transitional fossils! Petter Bøckman (talk) 09:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cup, Petter. Alan G. Archer (talk) 05:49, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Really nice work on the continuing comprehensive clean-up of Abiogenesis‎. Your efforts are very much appreciated.

Guy Macon (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you kindly for the kitten!

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	For devoting so much time to citations' format and links on vital articles, thank you! -- BatteryIncluded (talk) 17:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Thanks.

A barnstar for you!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you very much for all your recent editing efforts on articles - including those related to Abiogenesis and Evolution - your efforts are greatly appreciated - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 22:14, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!

Introducing the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology!

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 663 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in evolutionary biology.

Browse the new WikiProject page
Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abiogenesis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mercury and Eon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Natural selection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Doubleday. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Natural selection, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Life cycle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

wikignomes rock

thanks for your attention to the Occupy article NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 20:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

... for working on the Malheur occupation article. If you are interested in discussing other Oregon-related article, feel free to add Wikipedia:WikiProject Oregon to your watchlist. Otherwise, keep up the great work! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Malheur Occupation Barnstar

For your work on cleaning up the references on this article. MB298 (talk) 17:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The greatest barnstar ever. Thank you, partner! Alan G. Archer (talk) 17:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Occupation of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shrapnel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So was this individual involved in this standoff in Oregon then? (Usertalk:Forthe1789usconstitution) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forthe1789usconstitution (talk • contribs) 05:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Which individual are you referring to? Alan G. Archer (talk) 06:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citizens for Constitutional Freedom article

Hey! I've also created the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom article. When you have the time, could you reformat the citations just like you do with the Occupation of Malheur National Wildlife Refuge article? And fill in any missing details if necessary? That would be very helpful. Parsley Man (talk) 21:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. Alan G. Archer (talk) 21:56, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Parsley Man:I deleted the term and link "extradition." No extradition was required as Cliven was moved from federal detention in Portland within federal boundaries to the Las Vegas holding facility for trial at the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada Activist (talk) 10:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The terms 'extradition' and 'extradited' was commonly used by the media, perhaps inaccurately. The motion filed by U.S. Attorney Billy J. Williams used the terms 'order of commitment' and 'commitment order' in this case. (See: "Judge Will Send Cliven Bundy To Nevada To Face Charges", by Kimberley Freda of OPB.) Alan G. Archer (talk) 16:29, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kullman entry

Regarding that latest edit with the Citizens for Constitutional Freedom article, the user who implemented that edit was an unsigned user who only made one edit and that was the one you just undid. I wouldn't be surprised if it turned out to be pure, simple vandalism. Parsley Man (talk) 06:56, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The unsigned user's edit was based on an uncited report. Very questionable, and I gave more than enough time before removing the material. Thanks. Alan G. Archer (talk) 18:35, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the Malheur occupation article

Thanks for the nice work on the Malheur article. Keep up the great work! Scott P. (talk) 18:42, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir. Alan G. Archer (talk) 18:04, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Membership invitation

You are cordially invited to become a member of the WikiProject: US Active Armed Movements. The membership requirements for this project are somewhat experimental, and as such, your thoughts on the membership requirements would certainly be welcome on the project's talk page. Thanks kindly, Scott P. (talk) 01:59, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Alan G. Archer (talk) 18:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alan, FYI, I am working on an edit war complaint regarding my recent interactions with Scott at two articles plus the project page he mentions. If you visit the project page, please see the version history (and version history of the talk page too). Thanks NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 02:15, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I must now apologize in advance for the fact that this project page has already stirred up at least one opponent (per above). I also have no doubt that there would be many supporters of the page as well. Your honest appraisal of the page as it now stands, despite such early opposition to its very existence as originally proposed, would be very much appreciated. If you might happen to prefer to stay out of the question of the existence of that page all together, that would be quite acceptable and understandable too, but just please do let us know if that is the case with yourself too. Thanks, and apologies again, Scott P. (talk) 03:33, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I partially agree with Scott, and one of the area of agreement is that honest appraisal from other experienced eds would be helpful. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 09:24, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I'll give it my consideration. Alan G. Archer (talk) 18:14, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M60 Patton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stars and Stripes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Alan G. Archer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alan G. Archer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Examination of Apollo Moon photographs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Examination of Apollo Moon photographs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Examination of Apollo Moon photographs (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shibbolethink ^(♔ ^♕) 19:26, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alan G. Archer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Alan G. Archer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External academic review and publication of Wikipedia pages

Hi Alan, This is a note to ask: would you be interested in submitting any articles for external, academic peer review to improve their accuracy and generate a citable publication?

The WikiJournal of Science (www.wikijsci.org) aims to couple the rigour of academic peer review with the extreme reach of the encyclopedia. For existing Wikipedia articles, it's a great way to get additional feedback from external experts. Peer-reviewed articles are dual-published both as standard academic PDFs, as well as having changes integrated back into Wikipedia. This improves the scientific accuracy of the encyclopedia, and rewards authors with citable, indexed publications. It also provides much greater reach than is normally achieved through traditional scholarly publishing.

The WP:WikiJournal article nominations page should allow simple submission of existing Wikipedia pages for external review. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 04:35, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ralph René for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ralph René, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ralph René until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]