User talk:Alan Briscoe
Welcome!
Hello, Alan Briscoe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Philip (Pip) Wright, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Philip (Pip) Wright is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on Talk:Philip (Pip) Wright, explaining how Philip (Pip) Wright is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Ken Baker, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Ken Baker is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on Talk:Ken Baker, explaining how Ken Baker is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Carl Finch (referee), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why Carl Finch (referee) is really notable, you can contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on Talk:Carl Finch (referee), explaining how Carl Finch (referee) is notable. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.
Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
I know that is three articles at once, but if you can establish notability for these guys through an external source they can stay. We appreciate your contributions. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 15:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Edward Hughes (referee)
[edit]American football or what everyone else calls football but Americans call soccer? Weston in the US State of Massachusetts or another Weston? Can you give us a bit more about the guy? Cathy 172.147.206.89 16:25, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Edward Hughes (referee), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. 172.147.206.89 16:26, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Darren Drysdale
[edit]An editor has nominated Darren Drysdale, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darren Drysdale and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 09:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi. I have entered the common reference mark "†" into the text as necessary, and at the start of the relevant reference. So readers should connect the two in their minds, and your source is complete for the purposes of Wikipedia.
P.S. When choosing subjects for biography from the refereeing fraternity, please make sure they meet the essential 'desired' criteria of Premier League referee or FIFA referee, both with matches from those arenas under their belts. Football League alone is the absolute minimum, including a notable Cup Final appointment of some kind - some of those, plus any "assistant referee" articles, will inevitably result in deletion, either speedily or at AfD. It is best to hold back, as I am currently doing with Steve Tanner (referee), due to those same notability concerns.
Keep up your obvious good work, I am enjoying working on the articles further. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 12:03, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, Alan. Mr Hutchinson may well survive by a slim margin due to the two momentous facts you mention (career extension and title decider). And the same will be true of many more. Unfortunately, it follows that the opposite will be true of others, and they will suffer deletions (which would be anathema to me). If, however, you do not mind spending rafts of time on a well-worked article, just to find it consigned to the Wikibin, then by all means crack on with some borderline-notable referees. There's no Wikilaw against it.
- I prefer to hold back a little, and in some cases I have had to accept that I cannot prove notability, or perhaps cannot provide references if notability is obviously present. One such is Gary Willard, who definitely deserves an article, but the internet is not rich in sources for his contribution to the Premier League, prominent though he definitely was (and sometimes controversial with it). If any of your print references are suitable, he might be a subject-in-waiting who would pass WP:NOTABLE with flying colours.
- May I just say that it is refreshing to discover a fellow ex-ref on my own wavelength where referee interest is concerned.
- By the way, getting references to drop automatically into the References section is easy when you have gained knowhow and practised. Please read Footnotes Guidelines (MoS), or alternatively look at the edit source of any of our referee articles to see how it has been done in that particular case. Best wishes once again. Ref (chew)(do) 22:24, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Template:User page, by Andries (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Template:User page is a test page.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Template:User page, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:58, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Alan. I struggled to understand exactly why you expanded the sentence which refers to his being the last Welsh referee on the English list. The main problems were the creation of repeated references to "Football League", "referee(s)" and "Welsh". Add to that the fact that the edit did nothing to further clarify what is being said (which I believe was perfectly understandable in its shorter form anyway). I hope you don't mind, but I've reverted the sentence, and this is no reflection on you honestly. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 19:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I can see your point. I have therefore been back to clarify the statement, and UEFA's involvement in it. I also found reference to his full-time job, so have added his 'other occupation'. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 17:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gary Willard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- http://www.theargus.co.uk/archive/2001/08/13/5145472.Football__Dilemma_facing_man_in_the_middle/]</ref> but he continued to referee for [[FIFA]] into the following season, once having the
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Alan Briscoe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alan Briscoe. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alan Briscoe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alan Briscoe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination of Terry Heilbron for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Terry Heilbron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:16, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 23
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Please Sir!, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Richard Davies and David Barry. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Reggie Perrin trivia
[edit]The fact that a place gets a passing mention in a 1970s sitcom is not notable. If the place is significant to the plot, it might warrant a mention, but it still needs a citation from a reliable source. Dave.Dunford (talk) 15:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)