User talk:Alan.A.Mick
Please feel free to discuss any editorial issues with me. Alan.A.Mick (talk) 00:09, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
There hasn't been much activity at WikiProject Missouri or any of its child projects lately, and I saw your name on the list of active participants. If you are willing to jump in again, please consider helping to revive the project:
- Put {{WikiProject Missouri}} on the talk pages of articles involving Missouri. This helps to categorize articles
- Write, cleanup, or expand an article about Missouri
- Source a Biography of a living person living in, born in, or otherwise affiliated with Missouri
- Help spread the word about the project
- Update the project page or the portal
- Watchlist or check the project talk page for updates
- Join one of the child projects:
If you know anyone who might be interested in Missouri (its history, culture, sports, people, places, architecture, etc.), please pass this message along to them! If you are still interested in the project but aren't currently active, please add yourself to the list of inactive participants at the bottom of this list. Thanks!
On behalf of the project, fetchcomms☛ 23:03, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Invitation to join WikiProject United States
[edit]--Kumioko (talk) 21:59, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
Tildes in edit comments
[edit]Hi Alan,
Just noticed your edits on the history of the full reserve banking page. Just wanted to say that you don't need to sign with 4 tildes (~~~~) in your edit summaries, since when you display the edit history of a page, the system will automatically also display the person who made an edit and the time it was made. Also, unlike in regular text, the 4 tildes don't get changed into a signature in edit summaries. Regards, LK (talk) 08:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Thanks for the tip!
Full reserve banking
[edit]Hi. I noticed you added a reference to support the following sentence: "Proposals for the restoration of full-reserve banking have been made, but have generally been ignored or dismissed by mainstream economists, who believe that the costs and inconvenience of such a change would outweigh any benefits." - the reference is quite long and I wonder if you could tell me on what page I could find the support for the sentence. Also, is it supporting the "ignored" bit or the "costs and inconvenience" parts of the sentence (or both)? - thanks. Reissgo (talk) 19:48, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi Reissgo, I don't know the protocol for "talking" so I am answering here and will put a "talkback" tag on your page. The entire article is by a "mainstream economist"* who is arguing against the idea that fractional reserve banking constitutes fraud, an idea propagated by Murray N. Rothbard, Walter Block, and Huerta de Soto, all of whom are "heterodox" economists who want to replace fractional reserve banking with full-reserve "money warehousing". They are very much out of the mainstream. I think this should be more or less evident from the first few pages. Thus this is a concrete example of a mainstream economist DISMISSING economists who propose to replace fractional reserve banking by full-reserve banking. It might be hard to provide an instance of someone ignoring this idea, but it certainly isn't taken seriously enough according to the proponents themselves!
In addition, White explains WHY fractional reserve banking costs less and is more convenient than "full reserve" banks, and thus the article is also a reference in support of the notion that that is the common belief of mainstream economists. This belief is stated on page 424 (page 2 of the pfd): "Fractional-reserve banking did not need fraud or coercion to prevail over warehouse banking. It prevailed by offering customers a better deal. Fractional-reserve banking really has passed the market test." "Costs less and is more convenient" is generally equivalent to "a better deal".
If you are interested in a shorter explanation of the benefits of fractional reserve banking over full reserve "money warehouses" try these links:
http://www.lostsoulblog.com/2009/12/prof-lawrence-h-white-responds-to-jesus.html http://www.lostsoulblog.com/2010/01/prof-lawrence-h-white-responds-to-jesus.html http://www.lostsoulblog.com/2010/01/prof-lawrence-h-white-responds-to-jesus_29.html
If you are interested in corresponding in a more convenient manner, my email is Alan.A.Mick@gmail.com.
(*) Lawrence H. White, the F. A. Hayek Professor of Economic History, University of Missouri–St. Louis, and a visiting professor at Queen’s University of Belfast
Upcoming Wikimedia events in Missouri and Kansas!
[edit]You're invited to 3 exciting events Wikipedians are planning in your region this June—a tour and meetup at the National Archives in Kansas City, and Wiknics in Wichita and St. Louis:
|
|
And two local editions of the Great American Wiknic, the "picnic anyone can edit." Come meet (and geek out with, if you want) your local Wikipedians in a laid-back atmosphere:
|
Message delivered by Dominic·t 19:30, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Meetup St. Louis
[edit]If you are in the STL area on the 23rd, we'd like you to come to our local St. Louis meetup. Details here. If you are interested, please add yourself to the list and our Facebook group. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 18:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
October 2014
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Typhoon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:43, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
[edit]You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alan.A.Mick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
wmstl16
[edit]Wikipedia Meetup St. Louis 16 | |
---|---|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to attend the 16th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup. Please join the discussion if you have articles or topics for discussion for our focused meeting time from 7-8 PM in the room Chuck Berry. This all takes place as part of Venture Cafe's Thursday Gatherings at the Cortex Innovation Community in St. Louis. Come early if you want to have social time. Please do visit 16th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) We hope to see you there! St. Louis Wikipedians Join our WikiProject St. Louis Page and add your name as a participant |
WMSTL17
[edit]Wikipedia Meetup St. Louis 17 | |
---|---|
Dear fellow Wikipedian, You are invited to attend the 17th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup. Please join the discussion if you have articles or topics for discussion for our focused meeting time from 7-8 PM in the room Chuck Berry. This all takes place as part of Venture Cafe's Thursday Gatherings at the Cortex Innovation Community in St. Louis. Come early if you want to have social time. Please do visit 17th St. Louis Wikipedia and WikiProject Meetup and add your name if you plan to attend. THANKS :) We hope to see you there! St. Louis Wikipedians Join our WikiProject St. Louis Page and add your name as a participant |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alan.A.Mick. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Alan.A.Mick. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)