User talk:Alamar2001

Welcome!

Hello, Alamar2001, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Zzyzx11 (Talk) 19:22, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meadowview (Sacramento RT)

No, its not that the station isn't notable it's that the article is so short. My personal criteria for new articles is that you should have a multi-line introlduction (+), And atleast one SECTION (-).^SyBer_WoLff 11:27, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Cardoza

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Dennis Cardoza. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Daysleeper47 03:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW re Jan Scully

Some anon IP nominated her article for a Speedy Delete, Bio. I declined the CSD. Ronbo76 05:35, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think he just named the article as a copyvio. Ronbo76 05:50, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Kevin McCarty

An editor has nominated Kevin McCarty, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin McCarty and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:51, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

shopping malls

answered at length on my talk page.DGG 04:58, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

petaluma high school

I sincerely appreciate all the contributions you have made to the Petaluma High School page. --76.102.235.0 18:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In-N-Out

Regardless of whether Lebec is likely to soon receive an In-N-Out, it's certainly not the only one on the I-5 corridor between Santa Clarita and Lathrop, since I've eaten at this one, located at the Panama Lane exit in Bakersfield, California. jSarek 06:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SRTD

Hi, I noticed your contributions to Sacramento Regional Transit District. The Light rail in North America has a section dedicated to Sacramento's light rail system but it is not written. What's needed is a 1-2 paragraph summary of the whole light rail system if you'd like to write it. Cheers.--Loodog (talk) 00:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Alamar2001! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 9 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 357 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Daniel E. Boatwright - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Martin Gallegos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ken Maddox - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gerald R. Eaves - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gwen Moore (California politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Nolan Frizzelle - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Lynne Leach - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Susan Peters (politician) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Roberta MacGlashan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Susan Peters (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susan Peters (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Peters (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --MelanieN (talk) 14:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roberta MacGlashan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roberta MacGlashan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberta MacGlashan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Valley View Acres, Sacramento, California

The article Valley View Acres, Sacramento, California has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks sufficient coverage to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]