User talk:Al.dobyns

bullying warning

these users, 1995hoo and arzel have devoted their time to censoring the truth. I am writing a story about this for publication and will be documenting my experiences here including the users. Forewarned is fairwarned.

attempts to subvert the true history of this hate speech will not deter the truth. Bigotry and hatred need no more help.

CONGRATS, BULLIES. YOU HAVE BLOCKED ME. I HAVE APPEALED AND RECORDED ALL OF YOUR NAMES.

Edit Warring

Please Stop. Your edits will not stand becuase they are in violation of WP:NPOV, WP:LEDE and you have no WP:CONCENSUS for their inclusion. If you feel strongly about this issue I urge you to join the talk page and discuss on how to improve the article. If you continue to try and insert this material in this manner you will get blocked and you will have not done anything for your cause. Arzel (talk) 17:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored text

The following material was deleted by user Al.dobyns and is being restored because it documents the user's brief but abusive editing history. 1995hoo (talk) 17:40, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your revisions to Washington Redskins

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Washington Redskins, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. 1995hoo (talk) 17:12, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

attempts to subvert the true history of this hate speech will not deter the truth. Bigotry and hatred need no more help.

WP is not a place for activism. Arzel (talk) 17:20, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have now violated WP:3RR, further edits may result in your account being blocked for a period of time. Arzel (talk) 17:21, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Washington Redskins. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Ruby Murray 17:49, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please stop bullying and censoring now

I HAVE ALSO REQUESTED ADMIN HELP TO DEAL WITH YOUR INCESSANT BULLYING. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Al.dobyns (talk • contribs)

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Washington Redskins. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ruby Murray 18:01, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 1995hoo (talk) 18:02, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:11, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for vandalism at WP:AN3, POV-pushing, and edit warring, as you did at Washington Redskins. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 18:14, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Al.dobyns (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the information I posted is factual. The only reason it was removed was because some people that are fans of the redskins refuse to aknowldge the truth about the history of the name. The edit was a direct quote of another wikipedia entry about the subject the two subjects are linked and should be aknoqwledged. Al.dobyns (talk) 18:17, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you are repeatedly posting may or may not be factual - that is not relevant to your block - but it does not belong in this article, which is about a sporting team, not about ethnicity. To continue posting it after multiple reversions and comments is both disruptive editing and edit warring. You will need to address this before seeking unblock. Efforts of other editors to protect the article cannot be seen as bullying under these circumstances. (I corrected the format of your request) --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:24, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.