User talk:AkramBinWallid

Republic of China article

I notice your vote on the Republic of China. I thought it was better to discuss this issue with you here on your talk page than there. Before I go further into this issue please take note that if you have not contributed enough to the English Wikipedia, your vote will be put in the Challenged section of this consensus which personal I think that would be terrible because you would not a true voice in this consensus. But also take note that several Chinese users were put in that section, who coincidentally many of them oppose this move, because they have not contributed enough to the English Wikipedia. One being Cobrachen who made over 20,000 edits to the zh.Wikipedia and he is from the ROC. Realize this article is about the sovereign state which has existed from 1912 to present day. I will explain more tomorrow but right now I'm going to bed.Typhoonstorm95 (talk) 02:57, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AkramBinWallid, to inform you, your vote was put in the Challenged section because you have not contributed enough to the English Wikipedia.Typhoonstorm95 (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, AkramBinWallid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Being new on English Wikipedia you may not be familiar with all the policies and guidelines. But I have read your contribution. You are welcome to edit Wikipedia constructively. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Republic of China with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:43, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Republic of China with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:52, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Republic of China

Unless you can cite pertinent Wikipedia policy, DO NOT edit the closed sections of Talk:Republic of China Jim1138 (talk) 09:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Republic of China, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 09:53, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You people need to stop pretending to be civilised, you are using this stupid blocking excuse as a way to delete other peoples edits. Everyone can see what you are doing. So just that everything you do is on record, and you will be in trouble using your privileges to cause problems for other honest editors! AkramBinWallid (talk) 09:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't allowed to edit closed discussions after they are closed. End of story. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 10:02, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You and your friend Jim1138 are hypocrits, you need to follow your own advice and stop deleting other people's comments! AkramBinWallid (talk) 10:27, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please add your further comments to a new section on the bottom of the page. You should not be adding any more comments to the closed section. If you feel that I may have missed what you have to say you can post on my talk page. If this edit/revert war continues I will ahve to lock down the page. Not changing the closed section also applies to Eraserhead1 and Jim1138. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am not adding any comments, I'm just restoring the comments of other editors that were deleted by Eraserhead and Jim1138. AkramBinWallid (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have checked the state of the talk page now, only one real comment was added late, the rest of the changes were moving text around, or auto-signs. I have removed the late comment and relocated the section that I included in the close that was on another topic. This seems to be what half the edit war was about. Materialscientist has now offered to block any editors of the closed section. If the four of you involved in the edit war agree to stop altering the closed section I will unlock the talk page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:56, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another note: the way you liberally throw the words "vandalism" and "vandalized" around isn't especially welcome here. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 11:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:32, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Republic of China

Kindly request not to edit closed sections on that page. Given the history of warring on this issue, a violation will result in an immediate block. Materialscientist (talk) 12:51, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from removing the support votes as they are just as valid. Don't listen to the other Jeffery editor who just lying his ass off just get some support votes removed. Very unprofessional conduct. AkramBinWallid (talk) 12:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There will be no further warning, please read my message above. Materialscientist (talk) 12:55, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:58, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You must realize that you are violating Wikipedia policy, by deleting valid support votes in order to try and stop the move when the overwhelming MAJORITY consensus is in Support of the move. Everyone here on Wikipedia can see this, so you should be careful not to break the rules! AkramBinWallid (talk) 12:59, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at your edits, and you're deleting !votes in the course of re-arranging the talk page. I agree with the block, as allowing you to continue to edit would lead to continued disruption of the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 13:06, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AkramBinWallid for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. GotR ^Talk 19:17, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have now created a number of sock accounts I've removed the expiration date of your block. Amalthea 22:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]