User talk:Aknanaka

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia.

Warn

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. --115.82.96.149 (talk) 03:39, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well

Tell me what is 中國合併西藏. And who says that,or what book writes that.--Tr56tr (talk) 04:00, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dino nam (talk) 18:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017/03

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

 """Chinese history book claim Tang forces under Li Jingxing gained three victories over Silla forces in Maeso.In 675,Silla sent an envoy to offer Tang an apology and payed tribute to the Tang Dynasty again.Both Chinese and Korean sources mentioned this. According to this,Chinese sources seem to be the truth.About the strength of Tang forces,after the decisive Tibetan victory in the Battle of Dafei River in 670,Tang put most of its troops in the Western Front against the Tibetan Empire,so it was impossible for the Tang Dynasty to launch 300'000 troops against Silla.Korean sources about the strength of Tang forces probably be greatly exaggerated."""

There is no source support for this content.--36.232.202.101 (talk) 15:08, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017/04

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article.

Please use reference.--1.165.212.104 (talk) 04:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017/04

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Remove of content with no reason. --36.233.224.165 (talk) 11:02, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aknanaka, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

O1lI0 (talk) 03:47, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re

Invite to Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard.--O1lI0 (talk) 15:36, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]