User talk:Akj2935

Welcome

Hello, Akj2935, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Goodd-002 ^(chatme) 11:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

DO NOT COPY

Re: this edit, do not copy material from other sources and dump it at Wikipedia. This is a basic concept in academia that most students are taught as children. If you can't write in your own words, you shouldn't be editing here. Wikipedia will not tolerate copyright violations, plagiarism, close paraphrasing, or any other form of lazy content addition. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:29, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add

Hey, add his music video which was recently released by tseries... Made a music section.... Moreover, he write, composr and sing the song.... Akj2935 (talk) 16:04, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification

I have not added his birthday date... Some others added this... But i added box cricket league season 4 as it is currently on air in mtv.... U can see... But i got aleast this reference... But u deleted it.... Akj2935 (talk) 16:08, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Make pearlvpuri's wiki page private, someone xhanging it repeatedly and mentioned in the photo that a fan from Pakistan in his page

Make it privae Akj2935 (talk) 11:47, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edit

This edit is problematic for several reasons:

There is no justification for capitalising the word "born". This isn't a new sentence, it is a parenthetical in the middle of an existing sentence. Don't make grammatical changes like this unless you are familiar enough with English to do so confidently.
Changing "was ranked first" to "in the top spot" introduces improper tone into the article.
Changing "Times of India's Most Desirable Men on TV List" to "the top spot in The Times Most Desirable Men on TV" introduces confusion, because it's unclear what "The Times" is. Is it Times of India or not? If we don't know what The Times is, the content should be deleted, since we're not interested in every award organisation in the world. We only care about established, notable awards. Based on This reference it seems to be a list compiled by Times of India, so it's again unclear why you chose to remove the clarification. You also introduced incorrect English grammar, and "the top spot" doesn't quite have the professional tone of "ranked first". You also removed the indication that this was a list of some kind.
Changing "He was also ranked 26th in The 50 Most Desirable Men List" to "He also grabbed the 26th spot among the list of The Times 50 Most Desirable Men" introduces improper encyclopedic tone and slang into the article. He didn't "grab" anything. That's a metaphor. Some periodical ranked him. That is literal.
[[Ace Of Space 2|''Ace of Space 2'']] is not the correct way to format this link. It should have been ''[[Ace Of Space 2]]''. We also don't use blogs as references. See WP:UGC.
Lastly, this was not a minor edit and should not have been marked as such. Minor errors are cosmetic changes that could not be the subject of a dispute. Typographical fixes, adding punctuation, reverting clear vandalism, etc. Please do not mark non-minor edits as minor.

Please be more mindful moving forward. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:22, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When you made this edit, did you even read the reference you included? That article or press release or whatever it is, is entirely speculative. It even asks "But is this true?" You need to be able to distinguish between a fact and a guess if you intend to edit here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:27, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Special appearances

With regard to this restoration of content, the anonymous IP editor who removed it is probably objecting to it being in there on the basis that a filmography is supposed to list works where the person employed their acting skills. Token appearances on TV shows don't really qualify and just tend to look like fan cruft. Wikipedia does not endeavor to replace IMDB, and it is not an indiscriminate collection of information. We're not supposed to be listing every job the subject has had. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:00, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the soecial apperances

You see the wiki page of other celebrities, where these things are there without proper citations... Then add this .. Akj2935 (talk) 04:24, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Add special appearance

Why u removed this special appeanrances...you see other actors wiki page many things are there without proper references also... You do change in this page also.... Firstly some one remove his picture now this also Akj2935 (talk) 04:26, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the reasons explained by the IP editor, and, I now see, Cyphoidbomb also explained above: "a filmography is supposed to list works where the person employed their acting skills. Token appearances on TV shows don't really qualify and just tend to look like fan cruft. Wikipedia does not endeavor to replace IMDB, and it is not an indiscriminate collection of information. We're not supposed to be listing every job the subject has had.". I can't put it much better than that. Anyway, my talk page or your talk page aren't the place to discuss content - you should do that on the article talk page where other editors can offer opinions too.

The fact that you can find other articles which you think contain content they shouldn't is a reason for removing that content from those articles, not for adding it to this one.

Don't restore it to the article again now that you know other editors disagree, unless you can get consensus on the article talk page. That would be disruptive editing and edit-warring and could easily get you blocked from editing.

The picture was removed by someone who thought it was a copyright violation, and, I confess, it does look a bit "fishy" - but Commons had a deletion discussion and decided it was ok - so I've replaced it for you. -- Begoon 05:09, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Removed content

Why u removed, if u removed then remove in other wiki page also... I will add. What u can do do it bit i will add Akj2935 (talk) 05:13, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pearl V Puri; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Begoon 05:28, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I want to put this things... See other wiki pages... Not one many pages... Where this thing are there.... If u remove this things from other page then i will obey and dont put it. Ok till now i will add... Akj2935 (talk) 05:32, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then, if you continue edit warring, you will just end up blocked - which would be a shame. Read and understand the messages above, start a proper discussion and stop edit warring, please. I understand you are very keen to add as much as you can about this actor but if you keep being disruptive you won't be able to edit at all - and I would not like to see that happen - so slow down, stop knee-jerk reacting and think about it for a while, please. -- Begoon 05:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

You added this things... First... Then i will talk Akj2935 (talk) 05:34, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Otherwisr delete this page better Akj2935 (talk) 05:35, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

I told you many times... Firstly you check many celebrities wiki page, then you remove the content.... I will add this things... I made this page and you hell come to remove this things.... Better don't remove and show rules... You need to know the rule first... See other wiki pages have this things...not one many pages. You remove first from that page... Ten i will stop putting in it... Akj2935 (talk) 05:47, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Akj2935 reported by User:Begoon (Result: ). Thank you. Begoon 05:57, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Pearl V Puri. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an acceptable response to a dispute with another editor. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Akj2935 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why you block me... That fellow removed the special appearance as it is available in many other celebrities... But that fellow began showed me rule... But i added it in that particular page... Anf you blocked me... Told that fellow who gave complain against me to see other celebrities wiki page where many sections are there even without refrence... But i added this things with priper citations but that fellow removed it so i told him if you eant to remove it then first remove from other celebrities pages than i also follow the same... Check in this matter... Akj2935 (talk) 13:43, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Whether the content of your edits was correct or not is largely irrelevant to your block. You are blocked because your behaviour - reverting the article to your preferred version without discussion - was disruptive. In order to be unblocked, you will need to indicate your understanding of this, and explain what you will do to avoid becoming involved in such edit wars in the future. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Regarding remove of special appearance section

See in other celebrities pages not obe but Even many pages says surbhi jyoti, mouni roy arjun bijlani etc there is a soecial apoearnce section or the shows which they attain as a guest are there, but that began fellow removed that section from pearlvpuri page, but i added this things with proper citations... And that fellow gave complain against me... Wait pleasr review it and check it before doing this.... I also know to block and complain any user, but i will not do... Akj2935 (talk) 13:48, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Channels/networks in filmographies

Please don't arbitrarily add channels/networks in filmographies as you did here. There's no need for it, there is no value for it. There is also no provision for it at WP:FILMOGRAPHY. See also the Featured List Jennifer Aniston filmography#Television. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:32, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]