User talk:Akiva K Segan

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Akiva K Segan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~) at the end of the message; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kudpung (talk) 23:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page VÃctor Jara has been reverted.
Your edit here to VÃctor Jara was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.flickr.com/photos/59084976@N02/5450881783/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Akiva K Segan, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 00:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, Akiva K Segan. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Martin Van Buren High School, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Caidh (talk) 21:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Auschwitz concentration camp may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| caption = The main entrance to Auschwitz-Birkenau [death camp]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:32, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Death camps

Hello, Akiva K Segan. Please stop changing the wording of "concentration camps" to "death camps". These camps to which you refer served both functions and were called concentration camps.Hoops gza (talk) 16:31, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For Mr. Tag Hoops gzal. It is a lie and abets Holocaust denial and professional Jew-hatred to claim the Nazi death camps, aka mass murder, or extermination camps, were "concentration camps." Stop abetting Jew-hatred, "revisionist" history and hatred of non-Jews who were also murdered in Nazi death camps. While Auschwitz-Birkenau had large sections of slave labor concentration camp sections within, such as that of the German industrial concern I.G. Farben, the other Nazi death camps in Poland only had small number of slave laborers, used mainly used to continue to process incoming arrivals for gassing and burning, e.g. Sobibor, Belzec, Treblinka, Majdanek. If you are a professional Holocaust denier you should identify yourself as such. March 28, 2014.

Please do not use personal attacks. It is not Holocaust denial to refer to Auschwitz and Majdanek as concentration camps because that is what they were called, and that is the title we use on Wikipedia when referring to those two particular camps. Auschwitz is referred to in any number of ways, and may be best simply put "Auschwitz". You also tend to break links with your edits. Your edits on such articles will continue to be reverted.Hoops gza (talk) 16:55, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It is indeed a lie, and a great lie at that, to claim that Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor, Majdanek and Belzec were concentration camps. While the Nazis called them konzentrationslagers, they also used such ruses as "Arbeit Macht Frei" as part of their deception towards the forthcoming gassing and mass murder of incoming arrivals to each of those camps. Only a Nazi, a Nazi sympathizer, a so-called "neo-Nazi" would accept the lie that there were no gassings, no gas chambers and no mass murder of Jews, Romany and Sinti nor of over one million Catholic Poles, over one million Red Army POWs etc. If you are an active volunteer or employee of the Institute for Holocaust Revision or or eliewieseltattoo dot com, you should identify yourself as a professional Jew hate and Nazi sympathizer or Nazi. Stop asking me to engage in Holocaust denier as you keep on doing. It's sick and it's sickening. You should also identify yourself by full name (first and last) and place instead of hiding behind a mantle and cloak under the name of Hoops gza

May 2015

Hello, I'm Jan Arkesteijn. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Marcel Marceau because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Facebook. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 19:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nathan2055. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Airbnb, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 19:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at LinkedIn, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 19:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at OkCupid. General Ization ^Talk 19:41, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Meetup, you may be blocked from editing. Dunready (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 20:01, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]