User talk:Akinsane

License tagging for Image:Abstract mugatu.pdf

Thanks for uploading Image:Abstract mugatu.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Icon Championship Wrestling

A tag has been placed on Icon Championship Wrestling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. haz (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added a {{hangon}} template to an article. In order for an administrator to evaluate whether the article should be speedy deleted or not, we request that you provide a reasoning of why it should remain on the article's talk page. Thank you. haz (talk) 19:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this article is in reference to Icon Championship Wrestling AS A reference... by my authorized contribution on behalf of Icon Asylum Entertainment, I believe that this article is in NO different (with the exception of content) that any other article pertaining to Sports Entertainment companies such as: World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) or Total Non-Stop Action (TNA).

Icon Championship Wrestling is simply the NEWEST "Professional" Sports Entertainment Company in the U.S.

as ppl are welcome to add or amend content ad needed, this article (AMENDED)is considered current and up to date and accurate. WHEN the time comes for this article to be edited... wiki members including myself will do so with integrity.

Speedy deletion of E. Benji Lucero

A tag has been placed on E. Benji Lucero requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. haz (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Icon Championship Wrestling

A tag has been placed on Icon Championship Wrestling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wildthing61476 (talk) 19:09, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this article is in reference to Icon Championship Wrestling AS A reference... by my authorized contribution on behalf of Icon Asylum Entertainment, I believe that this article is in NO different (with the exception of content) that any other article pertaining to Sports Entertainment companies such as: World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) or Total Non-Stop Action (TNA).

Icon Championship Wrestling is simply the NEWEST "Professional" Sports Entertainment Company in the U.S.

as ppl are welcome to add or amend content ad needed, this article (AMENDED)is considered current and up to date and accurate. WHEN the time comes for this article to be edited... wiki members including myself will do so with integrity.

User warning

If you continue to add deleted material with no explanation as to why you feel it belongs in Wikipedia, you may be blocked from contributing for vandalism. Please stop. Everyone is welcom to contribute, but not in the manner that you've decided. If you need assistance, or if you would like your article to be placed in userspace instead of mainspace, please ask. Thank you, Keeper | 76 19:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Icon Shampionship Wrestling speedy delete

Hey Akinsane. The reason I tagged your article for speedy deletion was because it did not pass Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies, which clearly state that "A company, corporation, organization, team, religion, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of coverage in secondary sources. Such sources must be reliable, and independent of the subject... The "secondary sources" in the criterion include reliable published works in all forms, such as (for example) newspaper articles, books, television documentaries, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations". The subject of your article did not pass any of these notability criteria, which is why I requested its deletion. If you have any queries about Wikipedia's notability guidelines, please don't hesitate to contact me. haz (talk) 18:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.

"Presumed" means objective evidence meets the criterion, without regard for the subjective personal judgments of editors. Substantive coverage in reliable sources suggests that the subject is notable.
"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than trivial but may be less than exclusive.
"Reliable" means sources need editorial integrity to allow verifiable evaluation of notability, per the reliable source guideline. Sources may encompass published works in all forms and media. Availability of secondary sources covering the subject is a good test for notability.
"Sources," defined on Wikipedia as secondary sources, provide the most objective evidence of notability. The number and nature of reliable sources needed varies depending on the depth of coverage and quality of the sources. Multiple sources are generally preferred.
"Independent of the subject" excludes works produced by those affiliated with the subject including (but not limited to): self-publicity, advertising, self-published material by the subject, autobiographies, press releases, etc.

This text is copied from Wikipedia's notability policy. I would not personally classify a radio interview with a company representative as a reliable source, as reliability usually comes with published material, such as reliable publications and online references. The source is also not independent, as the company representative is responsible for its content. However, if you would like, I would be happy to request other editors to comment, or take this case to mediation in order to discuss your concerns. haz (talk) 14:21, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion indicates that the deletion was warranted. If you wish, you may wish to present the case to deletion review, but otherwise I suggest that it remains deleted. haz (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion

3O doesn't normally deal with deletion; WP:DRV generally deals with that. There's no way for me to tell what the page looked like, but I probably would have marked it for deletion as well. Icon only yields 134 Google hits, and none of the pages listed there are reliable, secondary sources. You'd think that, if it were truly notable, it would have been covered by at least one outside source. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 22:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Your recent edits to User talk:Haza-w could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. seicer | talk | contribs 17:38, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are also the subject of debate here. I would strongly encourage you to recant your legal threat, as per policy, you may be blocked for making such incidents. seicer | talk | contribs 17:40, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've been blocked until your threat of legal action has been retracted. John Reaves 17:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:IA_ENTERTAINMENT.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IA_ENTERTAINMENT.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 12:17, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]