User talk:Aking174
paragraphs on 2 potential articles
[edit]- Two of my potential articles are on Jonathon Ive and Milton Glaser. I found them both interesting because of who they are as designers and the impact they made. I also feel the contrast between the two is interesting. Being that Milton Glaser has been around for earlier days of graphic design without much technological help and Jonathon Ive is more or so in the newer age of designing today. Both have made impacts despite their differences in generation and age.
- Milton Glaser's page seems to have a decent amount of information on it. It lengths from a short biography from where he was born to his career. His wikipedia article also consists of a small amount of information on his company, Milton Glaser Inc. It also gives you a very small outlook on shows and awards. In addition to some information, a picture is given with a few statistics about him underneath.
- Interestingly enough, just from the small information given about his awards you can see that recently in 2004 he was given an award by Barack Obama which means he is clearly still being recognized today for his impact in design and remains important to the field today. You can tell that Milton Glaser is historically relevant just by the small information in his article.
- In Jonathon Ive's case he has not been around as long as Milton Glaser yet is and has clearly made historical relevance. He is fairly young and according to his wikipedia article, holds a great position as Senior Vice President of the Industry Design in Apple. Unfortunately, there is not as much information on his page as Milton Glaser.
- Jonathon Ive's article contains a very small paragraph on his biography, an equally small discussion on his early life & family. There is a little more information on his career life but certainly not much. His article also contains a section for his awards and nominations which from the look of it is a decent amount.
- http://miltonglaser.com/
- This website is clearly his offical website which gives me insight to him past and current workings. This will help add to his wikipedia article in great ways.
- http://miltonglaser.com/
- http://miltonglaser.com/pages/milton/mg_index.html
- This website is similar to the previous given website giving a viewer information on his work, his life, and interviews to look at.
- http://miltonglaser.com/pages/milton/mg_index.html
- http://www.areaofdesign.com/americanicons/glaser.htm
- This is a website with a page dedicated to Milton Glaser containing a small biography and various popular works of his. This gives me more insight to what he did that most consider valuable.
- http://www.areaofdesign.com/americanicons/glaser.htm
- http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20030801/an-interview-with-milton-glaser
- This is an interesting interview with [Milton Glaser] which is effecient because it gives me a chance to see words spoken from Glaser himself and is different than giving me information about him from an outside source. It gives me a deeper look into him than just statistics.
- http://www.metropolismag.com/story/20030801/an-interview-with-milton-glaser
- http://www.pbs.org/now/arts/glaser.html
- This is another article about Glaser but it also gives me links to other potential sites and articles I can use to gather information on him.
- http://www.pbs.org/now/arts/glaser.html
- http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_39/b4002414.htm
- This is a large article from business week which gives me a great insight on who [Jonathon Ives] is.
- http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_39/b4002414.htm
- http://designmuseum.org/design/jonathan-ive
- This website leaves you with an article containing a small summary of [Jonathon Ives] but contains an interview as well.
- http://designmuseum.org/design/jonathan-ive
- http://www.wired.com/culture/design/news/2003/06/59381?currentPage=all
- This website contains an article that describes Ive's aspects of design with many quotations from him which can be helpful in editing his Wikipedia article.
- http://www.wired.com/culture/design/news/2003/06/59381?currentPage=all
- http://www.macrumors.com/2011/02/27/apples-jonathan-ive-considering-moving-back-to-england/
- This is a small article discussing a rumor about [Jonathon Ive] possibly moving back to England. It settles the rumor allowing you to know that he isn't and gives a quote stating that he is too valuable to apple. I think this may be important to add to his wikipedia just incase someone is interested in knowing it or if ever the rumor arises once again.
- http://www.macrumors.com/2011/02/27/apples-jonathan-ive-considering-moving-back-to-england/
- http://www.apple.com/pr/bios/jonathan-ive.html
- Being that Ive's is very known for his work in apple it is very important to have a source fromt he apple website giving us a small description and photograph from the company itself.
- http://www.apple.com/pr/bios/jonathan-ive.html
- This is great research on Ive. Also, you did outstanding work on the Talk to Me page. Well done.--Theredproject (talk) 00:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Jony-Ive-Becomes-Vital-Post-Steve-Jobs-231173.shtml
http://gizmodo.com/5783889/jony-ive-high-school-drummer-to-apple-superstar
http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/03/21/how-britain-lost-apples-jony-ive/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204618704576641552976014170.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203388804576615173131109568.html
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2011/10/17/steve-jobs’s-family-gave-moving-words-at-sunday-memorial/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204618704576643511455556744.html
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904787404576529082936292492.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/29/jonathan-ive-apple-designer_n_940115.html
activity on the ives page
[edit]Good work on the ives page. You have others who are interested, and have been giving you a defacto peer review. One of the more recent ones includes substantial revisions to what you wrote b/c it was unsourced. My guess is that you actually have sources to back up what you said, but b/c you didn't s/he assumed you were making things up! So source it, and it will stick. Keep rolling. --Theredproject (talk) 01:03, 16 November 2011 (UTC)