User talk:Akieken

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! GregJackP Boomer! 23:27, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Raymond W. Godwin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GregJackP Boomer! 01:39, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your email, I need to point out the following. First, the information that was removed all have citations to reliable, verifiable sources which are independent of the subject of the article. Second, Wikipedia has a policy on the information which may be used in articles about living people. There is a noticeboard for potential violations to be looked at, and this article has already been to that noticeboard without finding any violations. Mr. Godwin has appeared in a number of sources, all of which have been presented, and not all of which present him in a positive light, however, this is not libel nor is it defamatory.

I am an experienced editor who is familiar with Wikipedia policies. I can assure you that the article is within policy, but would welcome other experienced editors looking at the article. If you have additional information that needs to be considered, I would suggest going to this noticeboard. I would also be wary of making claims of libel. Wikipedia has a policy on legal threats that they take very seriously. Regards, GregJackP Boomer! 18:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Raymond W. Godwin, you may be blocked from editing. Misrepresenting sources is very serious. Stating that material is in a source, as indicated by quotation marks, when the material does not appear in the source is not acceptable. GregJackP Boomer! 23:44, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Raymond W. Godwin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. GregJackP Boomer! 12:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am more than glad to support my edits. The "controversy" about Godwin in the Reeves case is frivolous at best, for several reasons. (1) The birth mother's statement that Godwin told her not to accept money from birth father was not corroborated, (2) the birth mother testified during the court process that she had lied to several individuals involved in the court case. (The birth father said that he had also lied in order to make his support of the birth mother seem more involved than it was.) (3) The courts ruled both that the adoption agency did not tell her to refuse support, and (4) that it didn't matter if someone told her not to accept support, as it had no bearing on the court's decision. Given these facts, it is flimsy criticism not worth writing about.

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lauren Miller may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

truth in advertising, the movie actually is a good time." <ref>Travers, Peter (August 30, 2012). [http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/for-a-good-time-call-20120830</ref> [[Focus Features]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:06, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lauren Miller may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

of truth in advertising, the movie actually is a good time."<ref>Travers, Peter (August 30, 2012). [http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/reviews/for-a-good-time-call-20120830</ref> [[Focus Features]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:29, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest policy

Hello, Akieken. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]