User talk:AkankshaG/Archive 2

Images

I've retagged File:Trucker hat vd.jpg with the {{cc-by-nc-2.0}} license tag, which makes it subject to speedy deletion. We do not accept images available under a non-commercial license. According to the flickr page [1] hosting the image, that is the license the image is under, not the cc-by-sa-3.0 that you placed on the image. Sorry.

I've also marked File:Ron in zombie shirt.png as a copyright violation of [2]. From this page (see bottom), the image is copyrighted to Ron English. If you are this person, you can submit a release to the permissions queue of the m:OTRS team. We can't just accept on face value that this image is licensed to you and you release it. It has to be confirmed.

Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 14:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vector Marketing

Hi there! Please have a look at talk:Vector Marketing please. Thanks! Phearson (talk) 15:50, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied there. AkankshaG (talk) 16:04, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ken Goldstein for deletion

The article Ken Goldstein is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Goldstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 11:22, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed content

I have added my concerns regarding my revert on vector marketing talk page Phearson (talk) 06:28, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it makes the article more neutral, please feel free to add-back anything in the controversy section that you wish, so long as it's supported by content that comes from a reliable source under WP:RS, and that strikes a neutral pose under WP:NPOV. AkankshaG (talk) 06:31, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OWN Accusations

Repeating how I WP:OWN is starting to annoy me and I feel intimidated whenever I try to make a change to the article, you have done this twice in the edit summery box and in the talkpage itself. If you can explain to me what exactly is wrong rather then a blanket statement of NPOV then that would be helpful. There are other established editors who can help out with the article, but with such a major change you made (even with a development tag you may have overlooked) I cannot help but bulk at some of these, and there will be disagreement in the content. Phearson (talk) 08:34, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of CJ Environmental for deletion

The article CJ Environmental is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CJ Environmental until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Them From Space 04:05, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vector Marketing review in progress

Hello, there is a neutrality review in progress on the talk page of Vector Marketing. Your input is requested since you have recently/activly edited the article. Regards, Phearson (talk) 05:02, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

SPI

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AkankshaG for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Phearson (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ciplex for deletion

The article Ciplex is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciplex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Phearson (talk) 02:39, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Planet illogica partners

Template:Planet illogica partners has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Phearson (talk) 04:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Goldpak cforgoldusa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Goldpak cforgoldusa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 15:55, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CJEnvtl logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CJEnvtl logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 16:02, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]