User talk:Ajwadsabano

LGBT rights by country or territory

Hello. Welcome to Wikipedia, unfortunately your recent contribution to LGBT rights by country or territory has been reverted. Even though this edit was made in good faith, it added a precedent of including punishments to this article not specifically directed to same-sex people. Consider opening debate on the article’s talk page. A copy of your edit is available on the article’s edit history. For more general advice on editing see the Contributing to Wikipedia page.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan ^(talk) 01:41, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting article expansion support

Greetings,

Requesting you to visit articles Islamic advice literature and Draft:Aurats (word) and help expand the articles if topics interest you.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you made a change to an article, LGBT rights in Saudi Arabia, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jp×g 05:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for tendentious editing

You appear to be here purely for the purpose of promoting Saudi Arabia and Mohammed bin Salman. In this edit, a copy of an edit you inserted in November 2021, this is very clear. Apart from ignoring the point made in November that it was misplaced — straight into the lead, with no corresponding content in the body of the article — it uses sources in a highly tendentious way. For instance, this source is supposed to underpin the phrase "reduction in the use of capital punishment", ignoring the negative part of the source content. This source is offered for the phrase "removing anti-Semitic and misogynistic passages in school education", with no attention to the source's statement that "schoolbooks in 2019 still emphasized women’s subservience to men and continued to demonize Jews, followers of other religions and gays, and continued to emphasize men’s dominion over women." And it's especially concerning to see this forceful indictment by Human Rights Watch blandly summarized as "many human rights organizations point out that Saudi Arabia must continue to introduce new reforms in order to be considered sufficient towards the improvement of its human rights record". I note also the gratuitous and flattering mention of Mohammed Bin Salman. This is one example; your other editing is similarly aligned to a particular point of view. Here, for instance, I see you removing sourced negative content. You have been blocked indefinitely. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | tålk 11:44, 16 February 2022 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajwadsabano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been an active contributor of the Saudi Arabia article for more than the past 5 years, enriching all the readers with the most recent precise details of the country to make a great article. The majority of my added content are based on reliable and verifiable impartial sources. The mentioning of recent improvements within a country which happens to be under a certain controversial political figure's governance should not deter editors to mention any positive updates. It's clear that this decision to block me was politically motivated which violates Wikipedia's WP:AGF main principle Ajwadsabano (talk) 12:36, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please do not make claims of a political motivation without actual evidence. In any event, see WP:NOTTHEM. In reviewing your edits, I am hard pressed to disagree with the blocking admin. As such, I am declining your request. If you want to edit about topics other than Saudi Arabia, please tell what those might be. 331dot (talk) 12:47, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajwadsabano (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read the guide to appealing blocks and I hereby abide by what it says, so please unblock me. I mostly edit articles concerning the Middle East and politics. Such examples are Emirate of Diriyah, LGBT rights in the Middle East, Armed Forces of Saudi Arabia , Women in the United Arab Emirates, Women's rights in Saudi Arabia, List of Saudia destinations, Abortion in Saudi Arabia, Cinema of Saudi Arabia, King Fahd's Fountain, King Abdulaziz International Airport Ajwadsabano (talk) 23:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your statement makes no mention of the reasons given for the block, nor does it address the decline reason in the previous unblock appeal. Johnuniq (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.