User talk:Ajorda9

Welcome!

Hello, Ajorda9, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Ajorda9/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ajorda9/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Ajorda9/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 04:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Anjamanuel (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Mz7 (talk) 21:15, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajorda9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello there, I hope you're doing well! I just received a message from Wikipedia that user "M27" marked my entire page for deletion. I am a new user to Wikipedia and apologize for any missteps I have made. However, these claims are extremely out of context. We can address mistakes, but deleting my entire page is highly unnecessary, undemocratic, and not at all how normal encyclopedia entries are managed. I would like to figure out 1. How to mitigate any errors I may have made 3. If possible, go through my draft page of Anja Manuel and outline how the sources I provided are incorrect. You noted that I am a "sockpuppet" because my draft page is similar to the deleted page from AnjaManuel's account. That is because I read the G11 Wikipedia guidelines and realized that I could not create an autobiography from her account and proceeded to make my own account to create an objective biography of living person. There is no illicit behavior here. I 110% welcome guidance on ensuring my biography is objective and would love a review of my sources to show I am not falsely advertising or spamming Wikipedia. Talk to you soon :-)

Decline reason:

Similar? No. Word for word identical, to a substantially large extent. There's zero possibility of this from two unrelated editors. Clearly you are working together. I concur with the previous assessment, there's also WP:UPE going on here. Yamla (talk) 22:24, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajorda9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yamla, Thank you for your response. I see what you mean, on my page, I did not insert the connected paid contributor note. My apologies-- I am a new intern and missed this step. I am not being paid by Anja Manuel, I am being paid by a consulting firm. We are actually not working together on this, her assistant gave me access to her Wikipedia account. What you all see from her page, is my writing, not the writing of Anja Manuel. Once I received the G11 notification, I realized I needed to create my own account to continue the page. You are correct that it is identical, this is simply my writing transferred.

To mitigate my error, I went to my user page to add a connected paid contributor note to abide by the UPE issue, but I am blocked. I do not seek to disrupt Wikipedia's culture or violate any rules. Also, I recall from the Wikipedia training, once I formally submit this page (as it is still in draft form), you all will have the chance to make commentary on my writing and citations. I 100% welcome community edits to ensure objectivity.

Decline reason:

We're not in the business of hosting ghostwritten vanity pages. No thanks. MER-C 10:25, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajorda9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Thank you all for your inputs. I had a chance to read over the Wikiorganization page and that has allowed me to see your perspective on this matter. I have shown kindness and a willingness to adhere to wiki rules and culture. To further this gesture, I would request that my page not be blocked--I will NOT seek to self-upload a biography of Anja Manuel. Instead, I will go through the procedures outlined in the Wikiorganizations page and request a senior editor to create one to ensure objectivity. Again, I don't want to violate anything, this solution ensures there is no ghostwriting, and we abide by rule G11, avoid sockpuppetry, and once unblocked, I will self-declare all UPE rules. Thank you! :-)

Decline reason:

If Anja Manuel is a suitable topic for an article, someone will write that article sooner or later. We do not need you to prompt us to do so. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:12, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ajorda9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@yunshui thank you for your input. I was following this article on the Wikipedia: Organization's page. It says, "I think my organization deserves an article on Wikipedia but none exists. What can I do? If your organization is notable enough to deserve an article, and you wish to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, the best thing to do is to provide any useful sources and request that an independent editor create the article. Specifically: On your user page, disclose your relationship to the organization. Go to Wikipedia: Requested articles and find a category under which to list your request. Describe the very basics of what your company is, no more than a couple of lines, and avoid puffery. Be up-front about your conflict of interest by mentioning it in the request. Find a number of independent reliable sources that have substantial information about the topic, and provide links to them in the request."

Again, I don't seek to break any rules and just like you, I want to create an objective page on this person. As per Wikipedia instructions, it says I should request the article. How may I go about doing that?

Decline reason:

You can make a request- but Requested Articles has a backlog of tens of thousands (if not more) of requests. In any event, you won't be permitted to even make a request unless you are here to be an individual, general contributor and edit about subjects unrelated to your conflict of interest. I see no evidence of that here, and as such I am declining your request. I suspect you'll only have one more chance before you lose access to this page too. 331dot (talk) 21:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.