User talk:Ajmccarrell

Image copyright problem with Image:Charlie_at_console.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Charlie_at_console.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:34, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Tom Moncrieff

A tag has been placed on Tom Moncrieff, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. SamBC(talk) 22:07, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sinai 48

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Sinai 48, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. -WarthogDemon 23:11, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Sinai 48

Sinai 48, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Sinai 48 satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinai 48 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Sinai 48 during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -WarthogDemon 23:38, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You keep deleting my responses on the talk page. Knock it off, it isn't very nice.Ajmccarrell 23:40, 15 August 2007 (UTC)ajmccarrell[reply]

I think you mean the article itself. I was explaining to you in edit summaries that you do not need a {{hangon}} tag for afds. Sorry for the confusion. -WarthogDemon 23:42, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No, I keep leaving messages on the talk page of the article, notating the notability of several production members and it keeps being deleted. Also, there are plenty of sources at the bottom, including All Music Guide, so why do you keep marking it as unreferenced? I'm very careful about that.Ajmccarrell 23:43, 15 August 2007 (UTC)ajmccarrell[reply]

Can you link to the talk page in question? I just checked and I don't appear to have removed text from any talk pages, and I'm unsure as to what page you mean at this point. -WarthogDemon 23:46, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here it goes: Here is a policy that makes it not eligible for deletion, "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable; note that it is often most appropriate to use redirects in place of articles on side projects, early bands and such. " Both Gary Hodges and Tom Moncrieff were part of Buckingham Nicks, which was a notable band. The producer and backup vocalist Charlie Chalmers has also been a major player in the soul music industry with uncountable hits stemming from the 1950's on. This is reason enough not to delete. Ajmccarrell 23:50, 15 August 2007 (UTC)ajmccarrell[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Sinai48albumcover.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sinai48albumcover.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 06:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:01, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]