User talk:Ajda

Welcome

Hello, Ajda, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Atilim Gunes Baydin 20:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

No problem, but it was actually Alessandro who created the article. :) —Khoikhoi 01:33, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation Ajda...kolay gelsin. :-) —Khoi khoi 04:39, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seher Bulut

Adja, I didn't realize you were a girl, but I'd like to mention in response to your posting:

the oldest verified living person is 122-year-old Seher Bulut of Turkey born 1883.

This case is not verified and in fact the 'evidence' was doubtful; I personally believe Seher is about 102, based on the documents that I have seen...particularly given the ages of the children. Or are we to believe that women give birth at 62 without modern technology?

Sincerely, Robert Young → R Young {^yakł_talk} 07:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

However, I would be interested if/when her death is reported.

Also note the page here: Longevity claims.

You'll note there's a woman in the U.S. supposedly born in 1881. Supposedly is not verified. Sincerely, Robert Young→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 07:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings,

It is not simply that Seher doesn't have a birth certificate (she doesn't) but that her age really is false. I have documents for this case including the birth certificates for the children. Her first child was born in 1924 and the last in 1948. Thus, I would guess she was born around 1904, giving birth at age 20 and last at age 44. Thus, Seher is most likely 102.

Seher is not alone: longevity myths persist wherever birth records weren't kept 80+ years ago. Nonetheless, to believe the case because she is Turkish and you are Turkish is simply nationalism, not science.

Please note that just because a newspaper reports "aliens" doesn't mean they exist. Neither does the Loch Ness Monster or Santa Claus. And yes, 'St. Nick' came from what is now Turkey! Add Seher Bulut to the list of fantasy claims.→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 12:48, 25 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are two sides to every story. Outside of Turkey, most historians agree that it was in fact the Turkish who killed millions of Armenians...called the "Armenian genocide."

Aside from that, however, we don't take inflated Armenian claims, either...such as Manik Bokchalian (1880?-1998). With no birth record, there is no evidence of birth. Also, if you have the records I challenge you to send them in...I highly doubt the oldest daughter is 91 but if you have a record for that, I'd be interested.

Sincerely, Robert Young→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 13:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from America's oldest claimant...Alberta Davis, 125

Just to show that we don't accept all American cases, either, here is America's oldest current claimant:

http://www.wrdw.com/home/headlines/5010191.html

What these people in the video don't understand is that a document issued in 1951 (social security records) does not prove a birth occurred in 1881. It only proves that someone claimed in 1951 that a birth occurred in 1881. Without a birth certificate or other early-life document, age claims are subject to age inflation.→ R Young {^yakł_talk} 15:01, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

USD

Turkiye'de 41 tane milyarder yok bildigim kadari ile. En son çikan bir rapora gore 21 tane vardi. Ulke hizli gelisiyor tabi, arada birsey olmussa ona birsey diyemem :) Baristarim 01:24, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:002kj1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:002kj1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Kaşıkçı Diamond.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Kaşıkçı Diamond.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Gryffindor 21:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Suleymaniye-sl1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Suleymaniye-sl1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jusjih 02:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Vapur_kadikoy1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Vapur_kadikoy1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jusjih 02:34, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bbp2.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bbp2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:47, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]