User talk:Ajax0714

Hello, I'm Daniel Case. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kayden Kross have been disallowed by an edit filter as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. 21:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

I did get your email and was going to get back to you. Since your edit did eventually get through the filter, and no one's reverted it, it looks like it was acceptable. Daniel Case (talk) 19:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks! Sorry for the double tap, I just initially couldn't figure out how to leave a message on the talk page, which is why I sent the email. Ajax0714 (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reya Sunshine

Please note that pages in your personal sandbox aren't allowed to be filed in mainspace categories as if they were already finished articles. Categories aren't a thing you have a prerogative to add or readd to a sandbox page; categories aren't allowed to have user sandbox pages in them at all, so categories have to stay off the page until you're actually moving it into mainspace as a finished article. Bearcat (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't realize that at all - thanks for the message, I appreciate it!! I was just trying to add everything the article would need before sending it to an editor - did you notice anything else that my draft is missing, or that's on there but shouldn't be there? Ajax0714 (talk) 17:29, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reya Sunshine (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of the references are not reliable sources. The reliable references are just trivial mentions.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reya Sunshine and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, just so I understand, I take it this article essentially needs to be strengthened with additional sources? I take it the AVN Camstar and XBiz articles weren't considered reliable, but it would be different if the information they contained was reflected in other sources like newsweek, etc. Is this correct? Thanks!! Ajax0714 (talk) 20:23, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ajax0714! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! • Gene93k (talk) 20:06, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Ajax0714!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Possibilities

Hi. You did a great work on Reya Sunshine. What are your thoughts on Kira Noir and Blake Blossom. I have already created Blake Blossom as a redirect few week back. Even this redirected article has more than 4000 monthly page views which shows her immense popularity. But popularity does not matter and we need sources. Kira Noir 's article was soft deleted earlier. If you think there are any good citations for her, I can request for an undeletion to put that into Draftspace so that we can work together on it. Share your thoughts. Thilsebatti (talk) 08:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and thanks for moving the page to the main space! Today I'll do some research on mainstream sources for both (I'm sure the AVN/XBiz ones are there) and if they exist, I'd also recommend creating the kind of Notability section similar to the one I did on the Sunshine talk page. Ajax0714 (talk) 09:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So I did an initial screen, and I couldn't pull anything that was solid for notability for either one. I'll keep plugging, particularly since the two most valuable sources for the Sunshine article turned out to be the academic study she was extensively quoted and analyzed for, and the "Future of Porn" mini-doc - both of which required more extensive research to pull up! Ajax0714 (talk) 21:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for spending your time on this. It took me hours for to find citations for Jia Lissa and Eva Elfie. Both of them are very popular in Russia. I pulled out citations from Russian languages. Blake Blossom is the present sensation in the industry. She deserves an article:( Thilsebatti (talk) 03:25, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]