User talk:Aisymniteia

Welcome!

Hello, Aisymniteia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Aesymnetea, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mean as custard (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aesymnetea

The article Aesymnetea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of intelligible references and absence of google hits suggest this is a hoax

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mean as custard (talk) 14:11, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've redirected the page to Aesymnetes, like I did for Aisymniteia. Google is still not the judge of what exists and what doesn't :) QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:16, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting reverts

Dear Aisymniteia,

Please don't revert reverts like you did on History of Parliamentarism and a few other pages. Instead, please discuss your proposed additions on the talk page. I must warn you that at three reverts, you would violate the 3RR rule, so please be careful. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:36, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:45, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]