User talk:Air7777

Air7777, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Air7777! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Gran Canaria Airport, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 22:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Uganda National Airlines Company a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Uganda Airlines. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 23:49, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits on Milan Malpensa page

Hi

with regards to your disruptive edits on Milan Malpensa page:

- Ryanair to Liverpool is going to end on 24 october 2019: MAKE YOURSELF A REASON OF IT. Summer 2020 on Ryanair website maybe not fully loaded, but it will no affect this decision (Ryanair will transfer these service to Manchester). The reason why there is no clear news is because companies announce only open of services and not (recurrently) closures, thet is why the reference is the company timetable. In addition you claim that official Ryanair website is not an acceptable source, tell me then what is reliable in your opinion. In addition, if you think that service to Liverpool may be seasonal, you have, AT LEAST, to move it in "seasonal" section.

- Link to NEOS website you are continuosly adding give no additional info: the link at the beginning of the page, links to Malpensa offical website timetable that include all services (included those of NEOS Air), that is why it is placed. Redundant references have to be removed.

- Do NOT remove comments, they are placed for a reason. If you do not agree with the content you can open a thread in Talk page, explaining your point

Remember that the arbitral removal of content is a vandalism, you have vandalised the page.

Hope to have not to come back on these, best regards Riktetta (talk) 11:51, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PS You have been recognised to already have vandalised the page with other user id (e.g. 213.122.231.207). In case of further, your profile will be reported.

@Riktetta: Where is the reference to confirm the flights are moving to Manchester?? the reference you've given to say the flight is ending isn't acceptable anyway, you haven't used the company timetable you've just attached you searching the flight. The Neos reference does give additional airline specific info and is not redundant, it is specific to the airline more specific than the airport timetable which in many cases the references you provide using that , using the airport timetable is lazy instead of using route specific references. You are acting like you own the page and every edit made is not "to your liking" so it should be removed because it's not how you like it. The comments you add are useless bits of information a not doesn't need to be made if a route may end or not its common sense if a route does end an end date will be added a note doesn't need to be added to say this. Air7777 (talk) 16:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Air7777: Your argumentations are inconsistent and deliberately ignore what already explained. Riktetta (talk) 07:39, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Riktetta: How? where's the reference to say the flights are moving to Manchester? How have ignored what has been explained i have commented on everything you've stated and given my answer. You're choosing not to accept it because you can't accept that you may wrong. Air7777 (talk) 18:26, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Air7777: The reference there is not. As I told you, companies announce new routes, not dismissal of existing. You can easily see that Liverpool route will end by the company web site (as the reference that was present and you don't like). In addition, to your points:

You: <<The Neos reference does give additional airline specific info>> : tell me which are. As told, Malpensa official web site include all the companies timetable, included NEOS. Charters (that, for your info, are NOT available on companies websites, NEOS included) can be referenced additionally.
You<<e.g. for charters are dead links>> it is not easy to identify right references for charters, it can happen that some ref may no longer be accesible, but does not mean a service is over. You are, of course, welcome to modify/add reference if a new one is available.
You <<using the airport timetable is lazy instead of using route specific references>> the reference of airport timetable given at the begin of a table is provided in order to simplify references of existing services, so that additional reference may used only for incoming/ending services and charters. Wherever a ref. is given for any single service would heavy the page and its usability.
You: <<You are acting like you own the page and every edit made is not "to your liking" so it should be removed because it's not how you like it>> that is YOUR exact behavior: you don't like comments? erased! you don't like provided references? deleted! you do not accept a route is ending? delete! you cannot own a page (and me not too!).
You <<The comments you add are useless bits of information>> this is your opinion. It can be acceptable, but it cannot be imposed deliberately to the page. Comments, as I told you, are placed for a reason, in the specific to continuosly control the status of the service/destination.

Can you accept above? Riktetta (talk) 19:55, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Warsaw Chopin Airport, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please use talk rather than edit war SovalValtos (talk) 20:27, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@SovalValtos: The route is referenced there is nothing wrong with it, not having it in the table is your own opinion between you and charles. Where is your consensus to remove them? You don't have one. Your argument is inconsistent choosing only to remove random routes. If you don't like it start a topic on the WP:Airports talk page. You are the one vandalising the page by removing sourced information. Air7777 (talk) 20:40, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ovda Airport

If you are moving pages based on discussions, you need to make sure the discussions are recent. On the Ovda Airport page, that discussion is from July. The airport is not a civilian airport anymore and is not on the IAA website anymore, it is a military airbase, so the CRYSTALBALL reasoning for the close of the RM no longer applies. You should revert your page move. In the future please be more careful when moving pages. Sir Joseph ^(talk) 19:11, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Level on VIE-LGW

Please note that Level stated to media outlets that their VIE-LGW route is not suspended but will not resume at all. Some reported this wrongly and the schedule has not been updated fully yet. You have to provide a source for the planned resumption newer then these press releases like austrianaviation.net. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.114.152 (talk) 07:46, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@88.217.114.152: flights are bookable on the website from 27 October [1] Air7777 (talk) 11:31, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Liverpool John Lennon Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 21:12, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Your recent contributions at Sofia Airport appear to show that you are engaged in edit warring; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not override another editor's contributions. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Charles (talk) 13:56, 12 September 2019 (UTC) @Charlesdrakew: There is no need to remove the routes they are sourced, how can i resolve it if you never reply, you only target certain users and only remove certain routes. For what reason? your edits are so inconsistent it's funny. You also keep re adding old information that isn't even correct anymore like adding routes that no longer operate so before calling other users out for vandalising take a look at your own edits, adding outdated information is vandalism. Air7777 (talk) 14:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that you have not made any attempt to resolve the dispute using the article talk page. You are resorting to hard reverting content, often without citing any reason in the edit summary. This is disruptive and exactly the kind of behaviour that leads to editors being blocked. Ajf773 (talk) 19:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ajf773: Why would I use one airport talk page when my edits are being reverted on multiple pages. Not sure why you reverted my edit as from what I can see on WP:Airports talk page you state "If it is sourced, and the source provided has an exact date of commencement (without having to trawl through a search engine), then I don't have an issue." All the routes I have added are properly referenced so what's the issue there? The user in question doesn't reply when questioned anyway from what I can see from the sofia talk page when it was brought up months ago.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Air7777 reported by User:Charlesdrakew (Result: ). Thank you. Charles (talk) 07:20, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Sofia Airport. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 16:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Level on VIE-LGW

Hey there. Please note that there are several current news reports confirming that Level stated it will give up and not resume its Vienna-Gatwick route, e. g. this ,this or this article. It is not unusual that airlines update their schedule after a press release. Best regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.217.115.191 (talk) 19:46, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@88.217.115.191: Flights on this route are still bookable on the airline website from 27th October, the sources you've given were posted nearly 3 weeks ago, if the airline were ending the flights would have changed the schedule by now which they haven't. Air7777 (talk) 17:41, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sofia Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Charles (talk) 06:43, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of airBaltic destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Sofia Airport. Charles (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

Everytime you modify something is always a mess...anyway, with regard to your modification in Milan Malpensa page, the reference did NOT come form a blog. Italiavola.com is NOT a blog (it is NOT either a user based web site) and the reference that was added to incoming Laudamotion service was legitimate.

Clear enough?

@Riktetta: It literally says at the bottom of the website "Blog on WordPress.com." Wordpress is a sight made specifically for blogging. They even call them self a blog in the "Who are we" section. Air7777 (talk) 21:20, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday Europe

Please note that Holiday Europe is a brand operated by Onur Air using their codes and not a separate airline (although not fully owned by Onur Air). Therefore Holiday Europe is linked to the Onur Air article according to our guidelines. Same as blu-express with Blue Panorama Airlines and others. Best regards.

@88.217.113.117: It is an airline it has its own AOC, the aircraft it uses is registered in Bulgaria, Onur Air is its operating partner and owner. The airline uses its own codes 5Q and on flights not Onurs. Air7777 (talk) 09:43, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Please stop assuming ownership of articles. Behavior such as this is regarded as disruptive, and is a violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
As you frequently ignore our basic guidelines and do not seem to read or care for them (e. g. Charters do not need separate sources as long as they are listed in the linked airport schedule), you had to be reported again. How about trusting users that are here substantially longer than you?

Proposed deletion of Holiday Europe

The article Holiday Europe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

insignificant airline, no regular scheduled service, owns single aircraft

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 09:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Flybe to Milan Malpensa - Birmingham

I wonder wherever you accept/ consider other users' contribution or you just assume to be the owner of the pages you edit: as I already explained (but seems you do not want to listen to) Flybe from Milan to Birmingham is NOT becoming seasonal. Seasonal means that is operated only during one of the two Iata season (winter going from late October to late march, summer for the remaining ^[1]). A suspension does NOT mean that a service is scaled back from yearly round to seasonal. The object of discussion, will resume during the winter season and will be operated also in summer = NOT seasonal.

You said that a service must operate everytime in order to be considered "all year long" but this is only a your assumption. Company are used to suspend services in selected periods, but this does not make services seasonals. According to your tought, it is enough that a scheduled flight do not take place to consider the overall service as seasonal.

You are imposing your assumptions to a Wikipedia article, even if it can be an assumption of good faith you are (once again) vandalising the page.

please review your edit and correct the things (and, once again, stop delete comments) Riktetta (talk) 19:31, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, i do not assume to be the owner of any pages you seem to make out you are the owner of every Italian airport page reverting every edit you find and adding notes for your self stating routes may end at a certain time with no solid evidence to back it. Most of your contributions are poor anyway using blogs as references for new routes where if you actually read what a reliable reference was, a blog is not one of them and you're lazy and never fill them in just adding the bare minimum of a reference. Seasonal does not mean weather it operates in the IATA season read the discussion that took place Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports/Archive 16#Seasonal flights, if a flight does not operate in every month of the year or has a break for more than 5 weeks then it is seasonal. Air7777 (talk) 21:22, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link to the discussion. Aniway stick to the point, here we are not speaking about references or other, but seasonality. Your (poor) complaints about the past, bring to nothing. I also suggest you to read carefully the message before to send them, your grammar appear quite poor sometimes. Riktetta (talk) 07:37, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Riktetta: Learn basic English grammar before you point out mine. There is nothing wrong with my grammar, your's is very poor. Air7777 (talk) 17:15, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Air7777: ahahah...lol! Riktetta (talk) 08:18, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Albastar charter Milan Malpensa Sharm

Hi

Is it worthy to differentiate between charters and seasonal charter as you did for Albastar in Milan Malpensa page? Albastar operates charters in a discontinue way. Company is used to suspend all the operations from/to Milano Malpensa (included charters to Sharm) between mid January to end of March, making it a seasonal service. There is no evidence that this gonna change in 2020. Also milan Malpensa official website, show no evidence of Albastar service to Sharm in Jan-March 2020. I would list it back in seasonal services.

Charters are seasoanals per definition, thus I would not make 2 different sections.

I also see that El-Alamein service is still present, but there is no evidence that service will be confirmed in 2020. Remove? Riktetta (talk) 15:31, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Riktetta: Yes, if there is no evidence to show it is not operating then remove, flights to Djerba should also be removed only 2 flights were operated in August 2019, 2 flights is not enough to make the table. I'm also trying to find solid evidence any of the flights to Greece operated this year and whether they were regular flights or they operated once or twice like the Djerba service. Air7777 (talk) 17:21, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Air7777: Usually Albastar charters to Balearic islands and Greece are known only in April-May period, I would wait before to remove them. Djerba and Enfidha have been operated in summer 19 for the first time; again I would wait for spring to see if they will be operated again. What about Sharm El Sheik? have you considered my notes above? Riktetta (talk) 08:17, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Various edit in milan Malpensa airport

Hi, I see that you recently deleted below services from Milan Malpensa airport:

Aegean seasonal to Kalamata: you said that it was not opearted since 2017, where did you get this info? I know that also last summer was operated (June to mid September). Flights were regularly reported also in MXP official website. Of course, if you look the site/s in these days that service is already over, it may not appear. Here a proof also: https://www.airportia.com/flights/a3413/milan/kalamata/
Albastar seasonal charter to Djetba: you said that only 2 flights were operated, where did you got the info? flight was opened this summer with a weekly service MXP - Djerba - Enfidha or, sometimes, MXP-Enfidha-Djerba (period May-Sept). You may have lost it since Malpensa web site, usually hide mid destination in traingular services, can it be?

Riktetta (talk) 19:18, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Riktetta: The flight number has for Kalamata obviously has changed from 2017 from the reference I found https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airlineroute/251709/aegean-airlines-expands-kalamata-routes-in-s16/ my bad, when I searched that flight number the last flight operated was in 2017. For the Djerba service I went on the airport website and it only shows 2 flights using the flight code AP7715, the may have used other codes but that's the only flight I can find. http://www.djerba-zarzis-airport.com/tunisia-djerba-zarzis-airport-flights-arrival-number-AP7715-date-2019-08-12 Air7777 (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of SunClass Airlines destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oranjestad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NEOS charters to China & Abu Dhabi

You, again. NEOS charter to Nanchang are operated every tuesday (thus weekly) starting from 26 November (it is enougn to check Malpensa official website at seasonal services page :https://www.milanomalpensa-airport.com/it/voli/voli-stagionali). Here another ref, from a tour operator, underlining NEOS services to nanchang during the whole winter season https://www.alpitour.it/voli/neos-dreamliner

Charters to Abu Dhabi, instead, will take place each 10 days, Calendar on MXP website is not fully loade, that is why you see only 3 services, but the charters are confirmed in the whole winter season.

Please restore what you removed, thanks Riktetta (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the reference then to show they are operated every 10 days? the calendar on the airport website for the winter season is fully loaded, it is literally the winter season now. Where is the evidence to show it will be operated throughout the whole winter season? The reference you provided for Nanchang states the flight operates from 26th November to 3rd December, if you look on the seasonal table it states these dates then the route does not operate for 2 weeks then operated another 2 flights this is not regular, a regular flight must operate a flight once a week for at least a month adding flights like this that are not regular brings down the reliability of the table it's like adding a flight to the table that operates once a year. You're the reason I remove them because you can't seem to provide a proper reference stating they are regular service, that reference doesn't at all state it is regular. Also the reference you've linked for Alpitour also doesn't state its regular that could be talking about the 2 flights from 26th and 3rd it doesn't state it is regular anywhere. A timetable for a charter is not a sufficient source to show the flight is regular a news source is the best source for a charter the airport website is not the best when it comes to showing that a charter is regular and operating. Air7777 (talk) 12:58, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Air7777: Nanchang NEOS flight, again, will be operated each tuesday starting 26 november as expressedly reported in Malpensa seasonal flight page (again https://www.milanomalpensa-airport.com/it/voli/voli-stagionali). No 2 weeks suspensions . Did you, at least, try to look the webpage? Maybe putting some filters in order to refine search? did you? I suggest you to try, you will easily see that MXP-KHN is present:

26 November as NO 00978
3 December (same #)
10 December (same #)
17 December (same #)
24 December (same #)
31 December (same #)

Then unknown because calendar in 2020 is still missing. According to your standard, this is enough to be listed (more than 1 months, at least one per week).

With regard to Abu Dhabi, it operates each 10 days as it is a charter operated in partnership with cruise line Costa Crociere, and cruises in EAU last 10 days. You cannot blame on me because of incompleteness of Malpensa calendar.

Tour operator reference state that listed routes are available in winter (inverno) season, thus meaning all over the period. Riktetta (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again where is the reference to show Abu Dhabi is operated? You saying it operates every 10 days doesn't mean anything without proof, on the Milan website it shows flights on 20th and 27th of December that is not 10 days and 10 days is not a regular flight. Yes I have looked at the page and did put in filters so stop getting rude. Nanchang isn't an option on the destinations drop down on mine on the 10th December it only shows flights operated by Neos to Santa Clara and Guiyang and on 17th only flights to Santa Clara no flights to Nanchang. This is a prime example as to why these references you give are not reliable you shouldn't have to search the page to find out if the flight is regular and operating it should be stated clearly in the reference. Air7777 (talk) 13:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Air7777: if you select NEOS only as company, it shows flight for each day. Every tuesday a flight to Nanchang is operated. Do not know how alternatively I can tell you. Is always difficult to find reference for charters, but if we deny the few we have, it is no longer worthy to list charters at all. Riktetta (talk) 20:03, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Simple answer is if you can't find a decent reference don't include it in the table. Air7777 (talk) 17:48, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But Malpensa official website IS a decent reference. Maybe the most perfetct that can be. Riktetta (talk) 08:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Riktetta: It's not if you have to search for the flights to see if they're operating or not, it is not a decent reference for charters maybe scheduled flights it is. It is definitely not perfect. Air7777 (talk) 11:24, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PIA services between Malpensa and Islamabad

You also removed end date of PIA service between MXP and Islamabad. Can you prove that service will continue after the indicated end date?

PIA website do not give any direct options, only flights in connection via Paris CDG, having the Milan-Paris flight Air France number (and NOT PIA number), while also Malpensa website does not give any chance after 29 November. You may be excused since the reference (https://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airlineroute/286741/pakistan-international-dec-2019-europe-routing-changes) is not well written and effectively seems to suggest that only on "day 2" frequence will be over (I was also wrong in considering this). As for what we can see, flight will be over definitively. Riktetta (talk) 20:10, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Riktetta: The first route line states the routing Islamabad-Paris-Milan-Islamabad which begins on 8 December. The routing you're talking about is the other way round operating Islamabad-Milan-Paris-Islamabad which is operated on Fridays and the new routing is switched and operating on Sundays. It's not that the route is ending they are just changing the day of operations and the order the route is operated in. Air7777 (talk) 17:54, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Air7777: Ok, but neither in that date there is a direct service between MXP and Islamabad. Not on company website, nor in Malpensa site. Check them (alongside with other flights search engine) to find out. Again, the reference contains errors (or it is not updated). Riktetta (talk) 08:25, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air Arabia Egypt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabuk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Málaga Airport. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Charles (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sharm El Sheikh International Airport; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ajf773 (talk) 21:03, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EasyJet

Hi - Please can you read WP:3RR. I suggest you revert your recent edit soonest especially as I have started a discussion on the talk page for you to contribute to. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 23:02, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Bamboo Airways, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 01:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kavala

why you are used to delete the flights for kavala's airport? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:214B:8130:5200:41D9:D6D1:2698:9857 (talk) 06:12, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2A02:214B:8130:5200:41D9:D6D1:2698:9857: Because the source you provided doesn't state Smartwings is operating the flight the airline name is blank. Air7777 (talk) 11:29, 23 January 2020 (We

The flight will be orerated by Smartwings, as WAW-KVA-VNO-KVA-WAW and the flight number will be 3Z7437 and 3Z 7436

@2a02:214b:8131:b500:fd67:b71f:4e0d:d727: Firstly, that is not operated by Smartwings, it is operated by Smartwings Poland. Secondly searching that number shows it operating WAW-CFU. Lastly, where is the reference to prove this as you can't seem to give one. Air7777 (talk) 17:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On the website of Itaka.lt its written that the flight will be operated by Smartwings.So stop delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:214C:827C:9100:1952:B825:A9C1:D3E5 (talk) 14:55, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You again... now you delete the flight of Belavia to Minsk. Well the tour operator is mouzenidis travel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:214B:8108:600:8DB2:CB8D:3174:92E3 (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2A02:214B:8108:600:8DB2:CB8D:3174:92E3: The route has no reference and the reference it did have the route wasn't even mentioned do not add it back without a reference, you need to add references. Air7777 (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

90% of what you delete you see that you are wrong, like the flight of Vilnius...So be more carefull... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:214B:8108:600:8DB2:CB8D:3174:92E3 (talk) 13:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@2A02:214B:8108:600:8DB2:CB8D:3174:92E3: I haven't been wrong you just haven't given a reference, no reference means it gets removed everything must be referenced especially new routes which you seem to have trouble doing and i've told you multiple times to do i'm trying to help you. Air7777 (talk) 13:50, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of TUI fly Deutschland destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nouvelair flights from Monastir airport

Hi, I can confirm that, at least to Billund, Copenhagen, Gothenburg, Helsinki and Stockholm-Arlanda, Nouvelair very much still run charter flights from Monastir. They're not bookable directly through the airline, but only through Nordic travel agents Detur and Almena.

Starting in late May, these flights, except those to Billund and Helsinki, will switch to Enfidha.

Should we include a link to, for example, Detur's homepage? André Devecserii (talk) 19:33, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Doncaster Sheffield Airport, you may be blocked from editing. SovalValtos (talk) 22:06, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with SAA page

Hi, I noticed that on the South African Airways page people keep trying to say the airline has ceased operations without providing citations or any evidence. There’s some nonsense articles online about it being ‘Imminent’ but nothing official has been announced yet, which didn’t stop someone from adding “Ceased operations 1 May 2020”. I’m an editor who mostly just goes around removing “(Route starts 3 May 2020)” from airport/airline pages as well as the paragraph on the Air Senegal page and I noticed that you’ve visited that page as well and (Correctly) removed an edit of mine where I used Twitter as a citation for a new route before there was an official announcement from the airline. I’m just wondering is there anything you know of that can be done to stop people from changing the SAA article? Maybe a temporary ban on edits or something like that? Jos2610 (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ http://prudata.webfactional.com/wiki/index.php/IATA_season

[1] ttp://prudata.webfactional.com/wiki/index.php/IATA_season

[1]