User talk:Aimonai

Welcome!

Hello, Aimonai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Altsoft Xml2PDF, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! digitalmischief (talk) 10:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Altsoft Xml2PDF

A tag has been placed on Altsoft Xml2PDF, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. digitalmischief (talk) 10:45, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{hangon}}

Xml2pdf

A tag has been placed on Xml2pdf, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Xml2pdf and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AVRS (talk) 12:23, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Altsoft

A tag has been placed on Altsoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. DefenseSupportParty (talk) 10:34, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Altsoft

I have nominated Altsoft, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altsoft. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. §FreeRangeFrog 17:15, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think that the page named "Altsoft" has right to present in the Wikipedia. The article is informative and encyclopedic, it doesn't violate any copyright law and is not advertising and oromotion of the company. Therewith the article is under construction.Aimonai (talk) 14:38, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recreated article

Proposed deletion of Xml2PDF

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Xml2PDF, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Even less notable than the parent company, no assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. yandman 11:11, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

I have posted a question at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Altsoft which you may be able to answer. Can you please return to that discussion to answer it? Stifle (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: Conflicts of Interest

Based on your comments at Wikipedia:Deletion review#Altsoft, it is apparent that you own or represent the company Altsoft, and your editing at Wikipedia has been exclusively dedicated to writing about the company and its products. Please be aware that this is in direct violation of Wikipedia policy on Conflict of interest. A person writing about themselves is engaging in vanity; a person working for a company that writes about them, such as you are doing, is engaging in self-promotion. I'm leaving you this warning: you need to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and stop creating articles on your company or its products or you will risk being blocked. Mango juice^talk 19:19, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Mangojuice, i will read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and stop. thank you.Aimonai (talk) 20:56, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of PDF software

All the items at List of PDF software have their own Wikipedia article. Please don't add a new one unless it has an article. Regards, Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 15:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Xml2pdf screenshot.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Xml2pdf screenshot.gif. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Altsoft Xml2PDF for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Altsoft Xml2PDF is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Altsoft Xml2PDF until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 23:31, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xml2pdf screenshot.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xml2pdf screenshot.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]