User talk:AimLook

Welcome!

Hello, AimLook, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:56, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian grammar

Good work! :) - Francis Tyers · 11:42, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Dear AimLook, why would an earnest contribution from a qualified philologist be referred to as vandalism? --Vladko 09:32, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Go away. I don't have the patience to fight you. --AimLook 10:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually...

...the image sucks, as well as the whole anti-X concept. I am opposed to any form of anti-X-ism in WP articles because it is inherently POV since it is doomed to be one-sided, so it qualifies as a POVFORK; and since it is bound to be WP:OR, since no serious academic work can focus on this alone without examining the rest. The same applies to Anti-Greek, of course. Anyway, have fun! Niko Silver 08:41, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:AntiMacedonianGraffiti.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AntiMacedonianGraffiti.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Antimacedoniapristina.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Antimacedoniapristina.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:50, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slavica

Hi! I see you wrote Slavica (alphabet). But what is the "Original article" in the comment at the bottom? If it was not written by you, you should rewrite the article because right now it is mostly translation of that original article. Nikola 06:09, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

User:Je_rectifie sockpuppet na User:Mr._Neutron

Zdravo. Mozhesh li da sprovedesh postapka WP:SSP za isleduvanje na Mr. Neutron kojshto ochigledno upotrebuva sockpuppet User:Je_rectifie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.162.182.153 (talk) 12:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you might be interested in joining WikiProject R.Macedonia :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_ROMacedonia —Preceding unsigned comment added by Capricornis (talk • contribs) 00:52, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Alexander Prilep.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexander Prilep.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Allegations of apartheid

I'm a little confused by Macedonians being a disambiguation page. Which group is involved here? -- 146.115.58.152 12:40, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Golem pozdrav

Try Wiki project Republic of Macedonia you may be interested? user:Makedonij 11:00,10 October 2007 (UTC)

Hello

You may be interested in this dispute [1]. It involves the deletion of the historic song "Makedonsko Devoiche" aswell as the deletion of the epic songs: Zajdi, Zajdi Jasno Sonce, Jovano Jovanke, Uči me majko, karaj me, More Sokol Pie.

Ireland101 23:27, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mala Prespa

Just wanted to say that Im not sure if an unilateral move of the Mala Prespa and Golo Brdo page was a good idea, I have previously posted the problem at Request move disscusion page.Dzole 06:37, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Ljube-slika.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ljube-slika.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian pronouns

Hi, in this article it says "Like nouns, Macedonian pronouns decline for case ('падеж')". I'm pretty sure that nouns don't decline, but I don't know about pronouns. Can you help? Thanks. Alex 202.10.89.28 (talk) 22:50, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Teodosij Gologanov

I've made a few corrections to the article about him (guess what they were). Feel free to revert them, but consider them before launching the article into mainspace. Cheers. --Laveol ^T 15:39, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope this is not such a problem as Ivan Gologanov is pretty controversial person - he has been on both sides (no matter whether driven by personal feelings or not) so it sounds pretty fair. --Laveol ^T 15:47, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pronouns again

Sorry for the hassle, but I'm not confident with my knowledge of Macedonian as a whole - isn't the word for "here" meant to be тука instead of овде? I always thought it was тука/таму and овде/онде but I'm not sure. Alex 202.10.89.28 (talk) 11:42, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Mihailov

Just one question - why, if as you say you're aiming for NPOV, do you delete quotes from Bulgarian authors and replce them with quotes from Macedonian ones (or rather a Macedonian one)? Shouldnb't there be quotes for both of his self-identifications? That is if as I said you're really aiming for NPOV. --Laveol ^T 19:03, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re Linguistic question

What's the linguistic term for a naturally evolving spoken variety used by speakers of different dialects (of the same language) to communicate with one another? Please respond on my talk page, thank you. --AimLook (talk) 16:05, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If i understand well your question, the answer would be diasystem. Francis can correct me if i am wrong. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 16:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's not exactly what I had in mind. My question specifically relates to the Macedonian language, where speakers of different dialects spoke in a fairly uniform "inter-dialect" (which drew from all dialects and was used between speakers of one and another) prior to the codification of the standard language. --AimLook (talk) 16:31, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Probably Dachsprache, dialect levelling, dialect continuum, heteronomous language?! -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 16:49, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dachsprache sounds about right. Thank you. --AimLook (talk) 04:24, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds about right aye. - Francis Tyers · 12:31, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian Language

Hello...

Can you please tell me why you chose to include United Nations in the nations where Macedonian language is an official language? Check those two out List of official languages by institution and United_Nations#Languages.

And, could you please cite a source as to why Albania is included in that list? I like have posted a question on both this article and Albania, but no answers...

And, please, cite sources when you change articles, if those changes are not easy to be checked by English speakers.

I'm a Greek and live in the local Macedonia region, but wouldn't like a flame war or anything.

Heracletus (talk) 10:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah...

Well, you should have used a Balkan language's infobox (Balkan nations' languages' infoboxes always tend to mention those minority language areas :D)

E.g. greek one... |nation = Greece
Cyprus
Europe
recognised as minority language in parts of:
Albania
Italy

Yet, if it is only one area (Liqenas or Pustec <sarcasm> I like Albanians less than people from ex-YRM </sarcasm>), you should mention that specific area...

Is there possibly a real source as to what is the status in Albania? And, you could expand the liqenas article.

Thanks for your time... Heracletus (talk) 14:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you write: |agency = Macedonian Language Institute "Krste Misirkov" at the Ss. Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, you mean they regulate the language or just are the ones who publish the official grammars and dictionaries? Cause, when you say that they regulate the language it suggests that they're like making the "official" language; the one that "is usually considered by speakers of the language to be more "correct" in some sense than other dialects." Standard language

Heracletus (talk) 14:13, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you go for "regional", instead of minority? I mean "regional" implies that the language has actually been recognised as an official one, much like the status Albanian has in (FY)ROM. That means, that if "Macedonian" really has the status of an official regional language in Albania, then, the infobox of Albania must be changed in the way the Republic of Macedonia's one is, as far as language is considered. Furthermore, it suggests more changes should be made to accord to that change. As far as I'm aware, official languages are specified by laws (de jure), or de facto, if none is specified de jure. Can someone find either a source that cites what the status of "Macedonian" in Albania is, or, at least, can anyone provide the Albanian view on the subject?

FYI, I really don't like Albanians... or the fact they gain rights to every adjacent to Albania land... Heracletus (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you, I didn't mean to trouble you. :P I'm sorry for bugging you that much... With respect, Nikolas Heracletus (talk) 06:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

Hi, I know you've received an invite before, but you might be interested in joining WP:MKD. Your contributions to Macedonia-related articles have been really great and we are short of (active) members. Среќен Божик. Balkan Fever 08:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Ljube-slika.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Ljube-slika.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Brainmachine (talk) 21:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Teodosij.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Teodosij.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Slavica alphabet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Slavica alphabet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slavica alphabet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:14, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]