User talk:AidanWriter123123

Welcome!

Hello, AidanWriter123123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AustralianRupert (talk) 07:41, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sir John Monash Centre has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sir John Monash Centre. Thanks! AustralianRupert (talk) 10:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir John Monash Centre (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jack Frost was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Insufficient notability; I'd echo AustralianRupert's comments regarding a mention within the Villers–Bretonneux Australian National Memorial.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sir John Monash Centre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sir John Monash Centre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jack Frost (talk) 21:19, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! AidanWriter123123, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jack Frost (talk) 21:19, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Sir John Monash Centre

Morning Aidan - I've done a bit of work on this, mainly around restructuring and giving it some suitable references to try to establish Notability. Have a look and see what you think. Personally, I think there is enough for it to now stand alone, rather than as a paragraph in the Villers–Bretonneux Australian National Memorial article, but it could certainly do with some expansion. There's a lot of material on Google, so I think there's some work for you! I'll contact the editors who previously declined it to see if they have a view, before I pass it. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 12:32, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much KJP1! Fantastic work, very much appreciated.

I'll research and make referenced additions where possible.

Thank you again for you time and effort.

Regards,

Aidan.

AfC notification: Draft:Sir John Monash Centre has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sir John Monash Centre. Thanks! Jack Frost (talk) 21:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Frost - Further to the above, you'll see that Jack has indicated he's ok to Accept the article. Pending any comments from the other reviewer, I'll do so tomorrow. So, slightly premature, congratulations! But it certainly needs some work and some expansion. I think there will be quite a lot of coverage in the lead up to, and at, its official opening. If you need any help on structure, citing sources, etc., just drop a line on my Talkpage. All the very best. KJP1 (talk) 21:40, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aiden - AustralianRupert has also given it the go-ahead, so can you re-submit it. I'll then Accept. A lot of the sources can be mined for further material. The build seems to have taken a long time so there must be more on that. And more about the design and the contents. And is there any controversy about the costs etc. in Australia? I've seen little bits which suggest that there might be, e.g. [1]. And there will certainly be more in the run-up to opening. A definite work in progress! All the best. KJP1 (talk) 08:02, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you KJP1, your help has been invaluable and most appreciated.

Yes, there are definitely more sources, both factual reference and conjecture, that I can use and cite.

I'll get stuck into improving the article.

Kind regards,

Aidan.

AfC notification: Draft:Sir John Monash Centre has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sir John Monash Centre. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 09:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sir John Monash Centre has been accepted

Sir John Monash Centre, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 09:29, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And now, timely, Congratulations! KJP1 (talk) 09:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Nice work with this article. Nick-D (talk) 10:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image

The image is great, buildings articles are always better with one. But are we sure it's not copyright? The rules about that are pretty damn strict on here. KJP1 (talk) 07:11, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you KJP1.

It's no trouble, I can confirm that the image isn't copyrighted.

Kind regards,

Aidan.

Aidan - I did warn regarding the strict interpretation of copyright on here. If you can get an image, it would much improve the article. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 21:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]