User talk:Ahulandiy

Dear Anonymous

Today you erased the number of speakers from the infobox. I have restored it. Also, I have adapted your proposal for the leader text. To be sure, Tashelhiyt is not spoken "by the majority of Moroccans". I have kept the word "majority", which is apparently important to you, but I have clarified the text. Maybe you could get yourself a username (its quite easy!) so we can discuss matters face to face, as it were. (Ahulandiy, 16 January 2016)

Ahulandiy, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ahulandiy! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! ChamithN (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Shilha language has been reverted.
Your edit here to Shilha language was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://aguenaou.free.fr/amadal/documents/langue/1914_justinard_manuel.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Shilha language page, your edit caused an ISBN error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shilha

Hello Kwami,

Nice to hear from you. I'll leave out the unique claims. See also the revised text in the article Shilha literature. There are indeed a few living African languages with an old literature, but apart from Ge'ez, it isn't much ("practically unique" means "almost"). Surprisingly, the oldest datable preserved manuscripts from the area are the sorabe from Madagaskar...

I also noticed that the IPA signs are not a big problem; it's the non-IPA signs such as ḍ ḥ ṣ ṭ ẓ that sometimes become invisible. Any suggestion about how to mend that?

"Ašlḥiy" means "male speker of Silha", and "Tašlḥiyt" means "a female speaker of Shilha". I'll add quotes for clarity.

Regards, Ahulandiy (talk) 09 September 2015

I've looked at the Template: Unicode page, but still have no idea how it works. I'll look into that later. (Note: I'm practically a computer-illiterate; the fact that I'm able to edit a page at all is already quite a surprise to myself…).

About the unique stuff: I should have made a clearer statement. What I meant is, first, unique among the *living* languages, and, second, the uniqueness of Shilha is not in the fact that it has a precolonial literature at all, but that some Shilha texts that are preserved in manuscripts are definitely much older than texts in other languages such as Hausa or Swahili. I've handled a few manuscripts in Fulfulde and Hausa, and they all dated to the second half of the 19th century or after (they are written on a type of European paper invented in the late 1800s). Shilha on the other hand has manuscript texts dated or datable to the late 1500s, the 1600s and a lot from the 1700s. In short: there's more, and it's older.

The holdings of the fabled libraries at Timbuktu are generally much younger than sometimes thought. Someone who actually saw those manuscripts told me that most of them are from the 19th and 20th centuries, the majority of them copies of school textbooks (introductions to Arabic grammar such as the Ājurrūmiyyah, introductions to Maliki law like the Tuḥfat Ibn ʿĀṣim, etc.). Boring stuff really. There are rumours about 16th century copies of texts in Tuareg, but I haven't seen any verifyable data on that.

Whether an ašlḥiy should be defined linguistically or ethnically is a good question. The practical approach would be to say that an ašlḥiy is someone who says he's an ašlḥiy. It'd be interesting to qustion some native speakers on this issue. For example, there are quite a few black people living in the Shilha area whose only language is Shilha, but I think it's unlikely that they would describe themselves as išlḥiyn; non-black speakers usually refer to them as isuqiyn (lit. "market people [i.e., bought and sold in the market]"], or even bluntly as ismgan "slaves". So with them, ethnicity (that is, skin color) seems to take precedence over language skills.

Ahulandiy (talk) 11 September 2015

Okay. Glad you're familiar with the manuscripts of the area. Maybe a more detailed description would prevent the impression that precolonial Africa was illiterate apart from the Shilha (and presumably the Arabs), and also prevent the (now obviously false) impression that I as the reader knows more of the subject than you as the writer.

Given that ašlḥiy doesn't literally mean a Shilha-speaker, and ethnicity is not the same as language competency, maybe we should also say that Asusiy is "one from Sous" rather than a "speaker" from Sous, and likewise that Adrawiy is "one from Draa". — kwami (talk) 16:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

{{Unicode}} should take care of the dotted letters. But IPA *is* a problem for people on some browsers. That's why we have the template. (And even for those that render the characters correctly, they may be taken from different fonts, making for an ugly display. The template fixes that.)

Many languages have different words used by males and females. A Japanese woman would not say ore for "I", and a Japanese man would not say atasi. That's what the Shilha description sounded like.

Shilha-speakers, and not ethnic Shilha? If I learn to speak Shilha, would that make me ašlḥiy? And if a child of Shilha parents only speaks Arabic, but thinks of himself as Berber, does that mean he's not ašlḥiy?

There are many languages with pre-colonial literature, often inspired by Arabic, not the least other Berber languages. There are libraries in Timbuktu. There's Nubian. Kanuri. Fula. Songhai. Swahili. — kwami (talk) 23:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop claiming that Shilha is unique in Africa for having a precolonial literary tradition. If you knew anything of the area, you would realized that was false: Shilha is merely one literary language among many in North Africa, the Sahel, and Ethiopia.

Also, please stop claiming that men say "Ašlḥiy" while women say "Tašlḥiyt". That is also false: both men and women say both "Ašlḥiy" and "Tašlḥiyt". The distinction is the gender of the referent, not the gender of the speaker.

Also, you should format all IPA with the template {{IPA}} so that it displays properly for all browsers. — kwami (talk) 19:39, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shilha language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabyle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm Callanecc. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Shilha language— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moulay Brahim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zawiya. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ahulandiy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Old Georgian language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgian inscriptions. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ahulandiy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ahulandiy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ahulandiy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manchu language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jerry Norman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 06:09, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still largely unsourced. This seems to be a translation of a biography page somewhere.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:21, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Erich Hauer

Hello, Ahulandiy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erich Hauer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer

Hello, Ahulandiy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Erich Hauer

Hello, Ahulandiy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Erich Hauer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer

Hello, Ahulandiy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hermann Gustav Erich Hauer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:25, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naskapi language, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]