User talk:Ahrvdvj

Ahrvdvj, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Ahrvdvj! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:06, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

January 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of most-liked Instagram posts. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Prefall 23:23, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

Note on adding unsourced content

Hey, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.-- Flooded with them hundreds 17:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied to sandbox

Hey, there! I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I wanted to let you know that I've moved your article out of the article space. The article does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved the article to your sandbox where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and are ready to submit it for review, place {{subst:submit}} at the bottom of the article and click "Publish changes". To reduce the chances of deletion, it is best to let a reviewer accept the submission rather than move it yourself as other editors could tag it for deletion immediately. If you would like to experiment, please use the public sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. -- Flooded with them hundreds 17:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Egg Gang listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Egg Gang. Since you had some involvement with the Egg Gang redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. CoolSkittle (talk) 21:54, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pond Hall Farm moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pond Hall Farm, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Emir of Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of most-liked Instagram posts without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pond Hall Farm

Hello, Ahrvdvj. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Pond Hall Farm.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:40, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 20:59, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]