User talk:Ahnoneemoos/Archives/2013/March
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ahnoneemoos. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Hello! Happy editing
 |
Hello Ahnoneemoos, Eduemoni↑talk↓ has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC) |
Stop vandalizing the WP:PUR pages
Look, IDK if you mean well, but you keep removing the formatting of the WP:PUR pages. Please stop. I've rollbacked your edits. If you have some objections, start a discussion on the page. Don't go removing the templates that have been approved by the project for a long time . Feedback ☎ 18:51, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- Please cease reverting the changes and cease moving the templates around. Every time you revert or move a template it is you who is causing a vandalism. I have reverted your reverts. If you have some objections please feel free to discuss it here or on WT:PUR. We have been using these changes for several months already since the old style was done years ago and breaks down navigation when using mobile phones. Please also see WP:BOLD and WP:OWN: neither you nor WP:PUR own these pages and anyone can do any changes to them. I advise you to discuss things first before reverting. Reverts are hurtful, evenmoreso when your reverts are breaking the project navigation and the archiving bot commands. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 02:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- Look, seeing your contributions, you're obviously new to this, so I won't bite. But I need you to understand that before you make a change like that, you need to gain a consensus on the talk page. Although I have been inactive for a long time, according to the archives, you never gained such a consensus. The original template had a consensus, and every time you revert it, you're violating that consensus and committing vandalism. However, I'm not going to be dramatic and report you or anything like that. Instead, I have done as you asked and opened a discussion in the talk page. If most members hate the templates as much as you do, it wil be no time before you gain a consensus. But for the next time, know that YOU should have started this discussion yourself. It shouldn't have taken a mini-edit war for you to gain consensus on such a change. Feedback ☎ 02:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- Like I said before, please read WP:BEBOLD and WP:OWN. Changes on Wikipedia do not need to be pre-discussed anywhere. Also, your assessment is incorrect, I'm not new to Wikipedia, been here since its very first year back in 2001. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 03:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why I have your talkpage on my watchlist, but I do. The way you're talking is not really good, nor is it conducive to a collaborative environment. WP:BRD says that you must be bold, and if someone reverts you, you discuss. Not you can be bold, and revert war to your version and then discuss, you discuss after 1 revert by someone else. Considering I've known that you've done this kind of thing and talked like this before, anything further could constitute a battleground mentality and an unwillingness to collaborate. gwickwiretalkediting 03:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- WP:BRD is not a policy, it is merely an information page, therefore it does not have to be followed. There is a reason why I'm reverting his changes and if you would have read this discussion objectively you would have realized why. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 03:27, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- By the way, we have moved this discussion to WT:PUR. You can see what's going on over there. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 03:28, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure why I have your talkpage on my watchlist, but I do. The way you're talking is not really good, nor is it conducive to a collaborative environment. WP:BRD says that you must be bold, and if someone reverts you, you discuss. Not you can be bold, and revert war to your version and then discuss, you discuss after 1 revert by someone else. Considering I've known that you've done this kind of thing and talked like this before, anything further could constitute a battleground mentality and an unwillingness to collaborate. gwickwiretalkediting 03:21, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- Like I said before, please read WP:BEBOLD and WP:OWN. Changes on Wikipedia do not need to be pre-discussed anywhere. Also, your assessment is incorrect, I'm not new to Wikipedia, been here since its very first year back in 2001. —Ahnoneemoos (talk) 03:00, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- Look, seeing your contributions, you're obviously new to this, so I won't bite. But I need you to understand that before you make a change like that, you need to gain a consensus on the talk page. Although I have been inactive for a long time, according to the archives, you never gained such a consensus. The original template had a consensus, and every time you revert it, you're violating that consensus and committing vandalism. However, I'm not going to be dramatic and report you or anything like that. Instead, I have done as you asked and opened a discussion in the talk page. If most members hate the templates as much as you do, it wil be no time before you gain a consensus. But for the next time, know that YOU should have started this discussion yourself. It shouldn't have taken a mini-edit war for you to gain consensus on such a change. Feedback ☎ 02:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Re;Imigration to Puerto Rico
It is always great to hear from you. Believe me, I know exactly what you mean about having a hectic life. I think that it may be a good idea if I took on the project which you mentioned. Maybe during April, which should be the month to allow me to take on the task. Tony the Marine (talk) 01:18, 29 March 2013 (UTC)