User talk:AhnSoonKyung

Drop something, but don't expect me to keep it. It's a waste of space. AhnSoonKyung (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We have so much in common!

Hi! PLEASE HELP ME!!! I just wanted to say that im the exact same as you! I HATE seeing wikipedia articles about Exo with stupid edits by biased fangirls that keep changing the articles to fit their biased standards so i have to continuously keep editing Exo's pages because I too hate seeing their articles look terrible >.< And im actually someone who takes wikipedia editing very seriously T_T I see you are a huge Big bang fan and love editing their articles because you hate seeing it look messy and not correct. I was wondering if you can help me with something. I see you are one of my big editors in wikipedia and i just joined so im not allowed to edit some pages. I was wonder if you can go to Exo's wikipedia page and change it from "Chinese-South Korean boyband" to " South korean-Chinese boyband" because the group consists of 8 koreans and 2 (used to be 4) chinese so its more fair to put South korean first instead of chinese. IBut, some people are being too biased and giving off the wrong impression that exo are mostly a chinese group and that pisses me off :P I am not being biased, I am just trying to put what makes more sense and what is fair because i like seeing all the exo articles proper just like you :) Anyways, im not asking for much but i really need someone's help. I would be GRATEFUL if you can help me since maybe you can understand my problem (since we both hate seeing nonsense written on our favorite boyband's wiki articles). Thank you so much and i hope you reply! :) Mayramussarrat12345 (talk) 16:37, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of G-Dragon

The article G-Dragon you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:G-Dragon for things which need to be addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 01:00, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

YG Entertainment template

Hi! It feels like there are negative feelings over editing the Template:YG Entertainment, and I just want to make sure there are none!

Second, I was editing according to the YG Entertainment official list of artists here. If you want to include the bands individual members, you would have to include all of them, as every single group member has done solo work under their own name. I personally think there are no reasons why Taeyang and G-Dragon should get a mention whereas T.O.P, Seungri, and Daesung don't. Likewise, the same principle applies to the members of 2NE1 and 1TYM as well.

I figured it would be easier to talk about it here than start an editing war on the template. Thanks! ²¹nolja 05:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I wasn't sure where to respond so I'll respond here. Good to know that no hard feelings existed!

I changed the template and added in the group members of 2NE1, Big Bang, and 1TYM in order to make it more complete? Tell me what you think. ²¹nolja 02:11, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HI! SoonKyung ^_^

hi! Your name is very pretty to look. ^_^ (once, I know I'm not good at English to understand me)

don you see the references8 that sources from assembly of korea? It is the official information for foreigners. I have a history of Korea pop from the 90s and only wanted to let you know that it was not. you seems like to latest trendy kpop, but don distort before the 90's kpop history. The rest does not matter.

You do not know this is not such is not the truth. Introduction of the National Assembly that South Korea is the fact that there is no reason to prove to the specific source. First place in your memory, or if there is knowledge, the introduction of the National Assembly of Korea is a lie Be the first proof. and if you love pop music Korea, by studying a little more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyrusbreath (talk • contribs) 20:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

the report called this press copies of letters by changing the article or the copyleft is not plagiarism and copyright infringement. korea.net, time.com and all blognews is could be Copyright. copyright and copyleft is a play on words. published articles and reviews from the music of the past in South Korea search across all government agencies, but those pages even know the history of kpop before the 90s, there is only a memorandum. (in fact, Korea's database is really schnauzer) Therefore, before you know the 90's worth of pop history, never see even a small article will not be available. As your trusted sources say the real history of how history would never be right? if you have the ability to record directly to that page, try.(copyright to copyleft ...) i will stop.

Orphaned non-free image File:Big Bang - Lies.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Big Bang - Lies.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

	Thanks!
	This is just to thank you for removing unsourced material from the BLP article G-Dragon. Biographies always need solid sources! Shii (tock) 13:17, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Big Bang(South Korean band)

hi, you have changed Big Bang(South Korean band)'s potrait in infobox. the changed image "Big Bang LG.jpg" is truly licenced cc-by licence, here are the evidences:http://www.flickr.com/photos/lge/5202963356/, http://blog.lge.com/2 . so the image is not a copyright violation, what's the problem? --Puramyun31 (talk) 14:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alive World Tour

hello, ive noticed that you're the one who keeps track with the big bang article, so i am just suggesting that should we have an alive world tour page for big bang itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EricOng (talk • contribs) 14:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Korean Film

Hello, I saw your ID on WikiProject and your edits on various Kpop pages, so I thought you might be interested in a debate at Template Talk on the topic of merging Infobox Korean Film into the generic Infobox Film category, deleting the Hangul/hanja/RR/MR information, or keeping it separate (as it currently is). I would appreciate it if you to contribute your thoughts or at least glance over it. The more people looking/thinking about it will give us better ideas as to what should be decided. Thank you. ₪RicknAsia₪ 08:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi AhnSoonKyung! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:SLGZetaBeta.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SLGZetaBeta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:15, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:SigmaLambdaGammaPantherDashLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:SigmaLambdaGammaPantherDashLogo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Big Bang (South Korean band)

added a link pointing to The Guardians

G-Dragon

added a link pointing to The Guardians

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

War Editing

I noticed you and another user have an editing war on G-Dragon's page. Please note that this is discouraged and may result in the editors being blocked from future edits. To avoid this in the future, just have a discussion on the talk page first so that a consensus can be made instead of a war. Thank you.LovePeace89 (talk) 13:12, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, AhnSoonKyung. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested input

Hello, I frequently see you contribute to articles listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture and would very much appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture#Eradication of variety show sections so that a conclusion towards variety show appearances can be made. Thanks. Abdotorg (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AhnSoonKyung. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Big Bang FAC mentor

It's CNY now so only have little snatches of time, but I'll try to help a little. Later... Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 04:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Open the protection

Ok its fine

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AhnSoonKyung. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AhnSoonKyung. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AhnSoonKyung

Please comment at the above case.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AhnSoonKyung. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 13:54, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AhnSoonKyung (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unfair execution as I didn't even get to defend myself prior to this.
I have no relationship to the other user, and the evidence/s used against me are not sufficient. I edit Korean articles, mainly Big Bang and G-Dragon and have long periods of constant editing and then inactivity (check my contributions). I do not have the time to create another account if I'm already so inactive on this one. I don't know Daivichi, but one cannot assume that just because we agreed on a topic - that an IP address did not agreed with - that this constitute as sock puppetry. If you look at our contributions, Daivichi and I may have overlapping ones (as I do with many other Korean-focused editors) but I don't edit nor is familiar with many of the articles Daivichi pursues.
This block is unfair, and I feel the the IP address/s (since many of the anonymous ones are also just one-time contributers to the Park Shin-Hye article) pursuing this is doing this to personally attack me for disagreeing with their perspectives on a wikipedia article, which I opened up for discussion in the talk page to avoid the 3-Revert rules. They did not follow through and continued to revert it so I asked an admin to block the article until a consensus can be form. The IP address chose not to continue the conversation and then this happens. Thus, I should be unblocked and my edit restored on the article as this has been an unfair attack over an edit on an article from an anonymous user, which consensus is still opened up for discussion but no one wants to contribute to. AhnSoonKyung (talk) 16:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Entirely unambiguous, checkuser re-verified abuse of multiple accounts to feign consensus. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 21:07, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of File:G-Dragon in Thailand.JPG

The file File:G-Dragon in Thailand.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]