User talk:Ahmadikafirkabaccha

February 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Qadiani. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

False accusations of vandalism will not help your case. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Qadiani, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:28, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Qadiani. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:48, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Hello Ahmadikafirkabaccha, I would like to inform you that your recent edit here [[1]] was a personal attack which is innapropriate here at Wikipedia. Moreover, your name "Ahmadikafirkabaccha" is an urdu (or hindi) phrase meaning "Ahmadis are the children of apostates" which I also think is highly inappropriate. Please refrain from your disruptive behaviour. Mbcap (talk) 17:06, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mbcap: Already reported to WP:UAA (which is severely backlogged) hours ago. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:09, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you think there are good reasons why these don't describe your account, or why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. Alexf^(talk) 18:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]