User talk:Ahhabib24

This is Ahhabib24's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musfiq R Farhan (February 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Musfiq R Farhan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ahhabib24! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting an admin is not a good idea

Hi. It is never a good idea to revert an administrator. It is a far better process to follow the instruction. Your actions across the wikis smell highly of conflict of interest and possibly paid editing. I also doubt that there is clear case of reliable sources in use here. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You did it again and then have the lack of wisdom to drop that warning on my user talk page. Stop, listen and think. Your combative nature and approach is quite wrong. I have moved the page to draft namespace. Please use the draft talk page for your continued conversation. No more edit wars or you will find yourself in deep trouble. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not Paid editing, don't delete this page again, thanks. User:Pigsonthewing , User:A. B. Ahhabib24 (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this article to the draft namespace purposefully, and you moved it back. You have been warned by me and by others about edit warring, and your approach, yet you do not seem to heed the guidance provided to you. The article is now firmly in draft: namespace, and you must not move it back to main namespace, as that task will be undertaken by an article reviewer when they are comfortable that it meets our standards. Feel free to edit that draft article, and use its talk page to discuss the article once your three hour block has completed. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note to fellow admins, please check the user talk page history for removed components — billinghurst sDrewth 22:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This guy Billinghurst delete an established page Ariyan Mehedi and blocked me....... please help me Ahhabib24 (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This guy Billinghurst delete an established page Ariyan Mehedi and blocked me....... please help me Ahhabib24 (talk) 22:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When your three hour block expires, please use the teahouse. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Indef blocked. Qcne (talk) 22:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Ahhabib24, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]