User talk:Aheezau
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Discretionary sanctions alerts
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Doug Weller talk 12:40, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
We don't link section headings
[edit]See MOS:LINKSTYLE. Doug Weller talk 12:41, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Your POV on multiple BLPs of US politicians
[edit]I have lots of BLPs on my watchlist, including several US politicians. I was surprised this morning to see that a brand new account had made extensive edits to two in particular: Al Giordano and Neera Tanden, in both cases trying to tie the people in question to sex scandals. A single hit piece by a freelancer writing at HuffPo is represented by you as an "investigation by the Huffington Post."
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
HouseOfChange (talk) 15:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
I'm only adding factual information using primary, credible media sources related to issues of public interest to relevant pages. I don't see what the problem is? Facts are not attacks... The Neera Tanden stuff was reported by ThinkProgress, which is wholly funded by the Center For American Progress, where the allegations and controversy occurred. It seems that your interest as a Wikipedia editor is to extinguish facts, and force honest editors into silence through bullying?
WP:BRD "Bold, revert, discuss"
[edit]One very good Wikipedia policy is WP:BRD. Please go to the talk page of the many articles to which you are trying to add new material, to get consensus from others that respects such issues as WP:BLP, WP:NPOV, and WP:UNDUE. I don't know if you are aware of the meaning of WP:OR and WP:SYNTH, which others have mentioned when reverting your edits, so I am linking them here so you can check them. HouseOfChange (talk) 16:04, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
[edit]
Your addition to Doug Band has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Doug Weller talk 18:37, 5 May 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ben Shapiro shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:27, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Your persistent reverting on biographical articles
[edit]If you revert again at any of the biographical articles you have recently edited, such as Ben Shapiro, where you restore something that you have added before but others have removed, you are risking a block. You can avoid this outcome if you will post on the article's talk page and get consensus for your change. As you know there was a recent complaint about your edits at the ANI noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Swarm ♠ 23:17, 10 May 2018 (UTC)