User talk:Ahardy42
Problems with upload of File:Bacon-annotated-EUR-USD-2010.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Bacon-annotated-EUR-USD-2010.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.
To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:42, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
You have done an awesome job on the Price Action page!
[edit]If you get a chance, can you contact me by e-mail? wikipedia at brookspriceaction dot com. Thanks
- Just sent you an email. --Ahardy66 (talk) 11:17, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
Price action trading
[edit]I noticed that Price action redirects to Day trading. How different is "Price action trading" from "day trading"? If it is the same, you should include all overlapping information from your page into day trading. If the two concepts are different, price action should be changed to redirect to day trading. I can help you with the redirect if you would like. Ryan Vesey Review me! 12:29, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi @Ryan Vesey - price action trading and day trading are from different categorisation heirarchies - day trading relates to the length of time that the speculator holds his/her positions for, but price action trading refers to a method of analysis that can be applied to any time scale. Thus a day trader can trade using price action analysis or not, and a price action trader may be a day trader, or not as the time scale on which s/he trades dictates, although price action traders generally are scalpers or day traders. Other types of trading on the same scale as day trading would be high frequency trading, scalping, swing trading or position trading. Other types of trading on the price action trading scale would be fundamental analysis trading, charting, trend following, and so on. I found quite a few issues with the wikipedia categories that I felt would be way beyond my wikipedia editing skills to tackle, so I have left them as they are. I'd be glad to collaborate on some work in that area. --Ahardy66 (talk) 13:13, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. Thanks for your work. In Credibility you have this sentence : According to widespread folklore / urban myth, this is 90%, although analysis of data from US forex brokers' regulatory disclosures since 2010 puts the figure for failed accounts at around 75% and suggests this is typical.[10] and your source seems to be Bary 2011. This is a very interesting subject and a rare opportunity to look at real statistics. I failed to find this Bary 2011 source on the web. Could you point me in the right direction ?. Thanks. Fusilleralexandre (talk) 08:11, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hi @Fusilleralexandre I can get straight to the source in Barron's Online by clicking on the link. That's the article I referred to. Is there some confusion? 86.145.65.192 (talk) 22:56, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
Capitalization
[edit]Concepts used in technical analysis are not proper nouns. Therefore it's "technical analysis", not "Technical Analysis". It's "bottom" and "top", not "Bottom" and "Top". It's "head and shoulders", not "Head and Shoulders", it's "price action trader", not "Price Action Trader", etc. Seems that price action traders and technical analysts are as bad as 19th-century occultists at Making Their Concepts Seem Important! Sheesh! Yworo (talk) 16:11, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks --Ahardy66 (talk) 21:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
More on Price Action Trading
[edit]Look at MTA.ORG instead of IFTA.ORG. I am not sure what MTA makes available to non-members. MTA has a body of knowledge that is more complete and active than IFTA's is. I am not a Wiki expert, so unfortunately, I cannot help you w/POV. It will come however, as the article gets bigger. Good luck. Sposer (talk) 16:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:Bacon-annotated-EUR-USD-2010.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |