User talk:AgentAnimate 2021

I will be using my talk page as a sandbox whilst my account is range-blocked.

Roddy Ricch

Roddy Ricch is definitely a rapper, not a singer, why are you changing all articles mentioning the phrase "... rapper Roddy Ricch" to singer? MelonIsYes (talk) 15:29, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RAPPING (non-melodic, rhythmic vocal delivery) is not heard in a majority of his songs. Singing is.

These are both two different things; Wikipedia is just not accurate enough to understand this. AgentAnimate 2021 (talk) 15:34, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plus you are not a recent changes patroller so you should not have the template on your user page. AgentAnimate 2021 (talk) 15:31, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aight first, I found all of your edits in recent changes, second of all, everybody else calls him a rapper, and third, the Verifiability of Wikipedia is not something that has anything to do with this. Ultimately, you are just putting an opinion onto wikipedia, which wikipedia is not for. MelonIsYes (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should be fine as long as you don't change the occupation of people and things like that, those kind of little details matter and you should probably talk about it in the talk page of the article in question first, or just don't do it at all if it's not that urgent. You seem like you know a pretty good deal on what you're doing, so try to not do things that could be interperated as vandalism. MelonIsYes (talk) 15:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dinosaur Train, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 16:21, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at DRAM (musician), you may be blocked from editing. FMSky (talk) 17:03, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hammy Down Versace. CAMERAwMUSTACHE (talk) 17:43, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:52, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]