User talk:Agencyplus

A tag has been placed on AgencyPlus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Chovain 13:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

agencyPlus is a software application, notable as it is the only 100% .Net SQL2005 smart-client application in an industry (general insurance) dominated by outdated proprietary systems (competitor systems; see TRIPOS). It's not a group, person etc. The company behind it, Insurecom, is a business in England (run by an Australian) that has it's funding from the US. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by agencyplus (talk • contribs) 00:57, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Please see WP:SOFTWARE for the notability guideline for software suites. Being the "only 100% .Net SQL2005 smart-client [...]" makes good marketing material, but does not make it notable by wikipedia's guidelines. Chovain 14:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rather strange of Chovain to use nn-group as the deletion criterion. The real reason in myy mind is WP:SPAM. -- RHaworth 15:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]