User talk:Ag.Chem.Solutions
Ag.Chem.Solutions (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, this account was created to offer solutions to farmers and more information on how they can protect their field crops. After searching myself, there were not very many fungicide definitions on Wikipedia other then just a general reference. Since there are a few options for fungal protection, I created four accounts to make it easier for you to review. Maybe that made it more complicated. Is there any way that we can proceed forward and have this page approved, as well as the other accounts and pages associated with this one? They include: Specialty.Ag.Chem.Solutions, Corn.Ag.Chem.Solutions, Ag.Chem.Solutions, and US.Agriculture.Crop.Protection accounts and the following four pages: Xemium, Headline AMP, Priaxor and Merivon fungicide pages - all of which have been drafted for your review and approval. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Thank you!
Decline reason:
Wikipedia is not a marketing platform. --jpgordon::==( o ) 16:04, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thank you for your response. The pages do not include any specific information regarding the benefits of the fungicide solutions, besides suggesting what they are used for. For example, there is no reference saying that a specific fungicide increases yields, etc. by a certain number. Instead I focused on explaining use of the solution and keeping away from a marketing statement, as per Wikipedia's policies. Does that mean that I need to revise the copy of the page to ensure that you think it's not marketing related? Thanks!
- Why can't I edit Wikipedia?
Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
- Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?
Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
- What can I do now?
If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
- Add the text
{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}on your user talk page. - Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
- Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Note to reviewing admin: There are five related accounts - please see this list. —DoRD (talk) 22:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space
[edit]Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ag.Chem.Solutions/Headline AMP has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Headline AMP, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space
[edit]Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Ag.Chem.Solutions/Priaxor has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Priaxor, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 19:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Priaxor, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Priaxor, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:05, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Priaxor, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Priaxor
[edit]
Hello Ag.Chem.Solutions. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Priaxor".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Priaxor}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)