User talk:Afgemb

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Mohammad Taqi Khalili, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Afgemb/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 15:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Afgemb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 15:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Mohammad Taqi Khalili, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Afgemb/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Question About an AFC Decline

I didn't decline your draft on grounds of reliable sources. User:Onel5969 declined it on grounds of inadequate reliable sources. You then created a duplicate draft in your sandbox. I declined it because it is a duplicate of an existing draft that is pending review. Please do not create multiple almost identical copies of drafts. It does not increase the likelihood of acceptance of your draft, but it does annoy the reviewers. If you want to discuss the original decline with User:Onel5969, either go to their talk page, or, better, go to the Teahouse, where multiple experienced editors can advise you. Again, please do not create multiple copies of drafts. Once a copy of the draft is in draft space, stick with it, and do not create new sandbox drafts. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Taqi Khalili (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment they left was:

Needs more independent reliable sources that are specifically about Khalili.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohammad Taqi Khalili and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:56, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]